leave her there

Because I’m expressing my opinion that a 15 year old choosing to become a baby machine for a foreign enemy is a crime that is comparable or perhaps not as bad as someone raping and killing a child. It’s my opinion. I don’t like child rapists or child murderers. FYI, not interested in getting into one of your late night pedanticfests.

 

I understand what a terrorist is. I don’t think what she did is worse than a guy raping a baby.

 

But she went of to breed these...


Let's break it down, that's a fact.

 

Maybe I read it wrong, I got the impression that you thought if the death penalty was re-introduced for one crime it had to introduced for others.

As it happens, I would be quite happy for it to be re-introduced for child molestation and murder as long as the case/verdict was solid

 

She was breeding them..Just take a look at what they've done ffs.

You say raping babies, these ****s, rape at will//Cut the kids from the belly, and throw it on on a fire.

You condone what she has has done, that's ok..

But don't get confused.

 

She did. She was a very stupid, and from what I’ve seen very cold, child who decided to become a baby producing machine.

If she’s going to be executed for that then there are a lot of adults who’ve committed horrendous crimes who I would also want to see executed.

I’m watching a documentary about the Moors Murders at the minute. Turns my stomach what they did to those kids.

We either have the death penalty or we don’t. It can’t be a selective punishment based on public sentiment at the time.

As it goes I’m undecided on it.

 

That’s not fair Comm. I’ve not condoned what she’s done. I think if she comes back to the U.K. she should go to prison.

I loathe ISIS and despair at what they’ve done to the short lived harmony we had with the Muslim community.

 

You see to me there's there's difference mate.


The Moors murders were appaling, thankfully they got caught.

Now have you ever seen any death videos from them ISIS ****s?


The type she went to breed. BUT ON MASS.

 

For what?

come on, stan, tobes, windsor etc.

Please enlighten us

 

It was abolished because there were an unacceptable number of bad convictions (for me that number would be one), the yanks seem to have a decent system on this whereby a death penalty can be scheduled for years ahead giving the chance for new evidence/techknowledgey to come forward. We used to sentence and carry out quickly only to find out later the conviction was dubious.

 

Are you on the wum?

 

Nope, it happened which is why it was abolished.

 

In the 1600's?

 

Probably, and right up to the late 1950s.

 

You mean when Pierpoint got made redundant?

 

Very much this ... I can accept that she was young and easily influenced ... but I'm ****ed if I have any real sympathy for her current plight ... she chose to be part of a movement that feels it has a divine right to subject the rest of humanity to a very narrow and extreme interpretation of Sharia law ... the UK is no place for such views ... we have had generations of increasing secularisation and that has undeniably helped to increase tolerance of the faith and creed of others ... or, indeed, the choice not to believe in God at all ... if you can't accept that, and abide by such principles, stay outside of these isles... simple

 

Yep
Look up Derek Bentley (1953), he is just one of many.

 

Bang..Just like that Fosse comes in with a post, and he's 100% correct...

Now i know why i liked you...

 

I read their book mate, i used to read loads..I may act stupid, and drink to much.