But you wouldn't be happy to see the result of the Parliamentary vote to reject a No deal exit? Most MPs accepted that also as a result of an amendment put forward by an alliance of neighbouring MPs one Tory one Labour. This is a Parliamentary democracy after all not one in which only referendums have to be respected. Or do you disagree with that and hide behind the non-binding character of it?
Parliament had the chance to vote for a binding no no-deal amendment (Cooper) and it didn't get a majority. It's easy for MP's to vote for an amendment that says, "we don't want no deal but this is nothing more than an expression of wish."
For me, it makes a mockery of Parliament to vote for a negative. They should be proactive and vote for a positive, and, fortunately, WTO is there as a fallback if they fail

