LCS Consultation document

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Rangers Til I Die said:
OK team, have a read of this and see what you make of it.

Can anyone explain the last sentence in paragraph 3.32?

However you choose to view the sentiments in the document, it shows that the LCS is very far from a done deal for our beloved QPR.
Click to expand...

Having a quick skim of that report there's an awful lot of words used to basically say nothing that we don't know already, I think anyone of us could have said that as we all know that there would be objections from stakeholders, local residents, users of the scrubs etc. I see they didn't bother to interview anyone from the club to find out exactly what the plan may be and I'm not sure that we're looking at a 30k stadium anyway, plus Imperial College are not to my knowledge the landlords of QPR at Loftus Road, Harlington Yes.....so much for research......

I'm sure there is much going on behind the scenes that will put a lot of these concerns to rest and it would appear that the area needs considerable investment so unless these local are going to cough up millions the only viable options is outside investment......
 
Tramore Ranger said:
Having a quick skim of that report there's an awful lot of words used to basically say nothing that we don't know already, I think anyone of us could have said that as we all know that there would be objections from stakeholders, local residents, users of the scrubs etc. I see they didn't bother to interview anyone from the club to find out exactly what the plan may be and I'm not sure that we're looking at a 30k stadium anyway, plus Imperial College are not to my knowledge the landlords of QPR at Loftus Road, Harlington Yes.....so much for research......

I'm sure there is much going on behind the scenes that will put a lot of these concerns to rest and it would appear that the area needs considerable investment so unless these local are going to cough up millions the only viable options is outside investment......
Click to expand...

That's it of course. Knew it sounded wrong!
 
Seems a very one-sided report.
The list of people interviewed tells you all you need to know about hearing our side of the proposed use of the site.
 
Rangers Til I Die said:
OK team, have a read of this and see what you make of it.

Can anyone explain the last sentence in paragraph 3.32?

However you choose to view the sentiments in the document, it shows that the LCS is very far from a done deal for our beloved QPR.
Click to expand...
Regardless of how bias and NIMBY-driven this report is it does show that we would be up against yet another well organised pressure group which, as we have seen from the training ground fiasco, could block progress for years to come. That's on top of the fact that the council clearly wants to do nothing to help us out despite the vague claims of wanting to keep the club in the borough. There's no point in wasting time and money on such an option IMO.
 
QPAAAAAGH said:
Regardless of how bias and NIMBY-driven this report is it does show that we would be up against yet another well organised pressure group which, as we have seen from the training ground fiasco, could block progress for years to come. That's on top of the fact that the council clearly wants to do nothing to help us out despite the vague claims of wanting to keep the club in the borough. There's no point in wasting time and money on such an option IMO.
Click to expand...

Hard to disagree with sadly.
 
Time for a re-think on a stadium move, with the training ground we had a supportive council and just a few hundred objectors, this is much different we have an un-supportive council and tens of thousands of local objectors, plus the hospital needing more space for parking, this move is dead in the water.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back