Off Topic Climate Change

@Tobes I think I did mention a grease peddler recently, so I might be wrong there re the timing of mentions

 

he said I was deluded, and seems to decline every request to show that with in context quotes

 

He rarely actually gets into actual debates, as he got burned when he's tried that in the past.

 

ahh, I see. Got to close to the sun did he

 

Yet again in your attempt to have the last word and demonstrate to Sisu your intelligence, you haven’t bothered to read what I posted.
I haven’t said whether I agree or disagree with Sisu’s stance on climate control. Why would I then argue against it. Let me repeat myself, I won’t debate with Sisu.

 

Why bring me into it. I offered you straight nerd keyboard combat, and you declined.

 

So you're here for no purpose other than to post your usual mindless drivel, because this is yet another topic you're out of your depth on.

 

I'm so gonna lose it now in a minute

please log in to view this image

 

You’ve just answered your own question. Declined every request...

 

The burns are clearly still stinging. He tries to challenge, but offers nothing at all of substance.

He's on a thread about climate change, yet clearly has no knowledge or interest in it. How sad is that?

 

then why make claims you aint prepared to back up? tut tut

 

Keep believing what you want, it makes no difference to me.

 

that's the thing

same thing when the topic is astronomy, another interest of mine.

I get the reactions, I understand them. Some people are ruled by their limbic systems, the leftover primitive parts of the brain.

So no matter what i say, they will be on the opposite side of the debate circle jerking liking gibberish posts purely because they are having a go at me personally.

Boo hooo wahhhhhh I'm so upset

 

Cheers for the permission, but your ignorance and pointlessness is self declared and clearly evident.

 

The delusion isn’t about the climate you complete fool, it’s around the fact that you believe you are the only one who has any kind of argument, credible or not.
And I’m supposed to be the thick one

 

"An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States."


What?! a team of 32 deniers from 24 institutions in 8 countries prove CO2's benefit to the planet.. DENIERS!! @Tobes

meanwhile not a shred of evidence of doom, none nada nil

 

They're too closed minded for discussion, especially if it reveals their limitations. Sadly for them, the limitations shine out anyway, so they accuse others of trying to be clever in the hope of dragging them down to their level.

I'm surprised there hasn't been a few cries for help yet. Appeals to the gallery are their usual methods.

 

If you read through the cli posts, I am the only one with a credible argument on cli sci in this thread.

I can prove it, and you can't disprove it.

No one cares about the non cli sci ****

 

As you're the expert at it, I will take this as a compliment

 

Why are you here?