Arsenal's Dick Emery Put On Sack Watch By Club Mandarins

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PISKIE said:
No, I gave him the option to choose what bet he wanted, avatar, sig, name as I said.

I didn't give him the option to change the rules and insert get out clauses.
Click to expand...

Sounds just like something Hiag would say to me.
 
This is all very straight forward. The loser of an avatar bet doesn't get any say in what their avatar is.

You either take a straight bet or there's no bet. No ****ing around with the rules. <ok>
 
Quesadaad said:
just walk away mate
He’s won this round
Click to expand...

Reminds me of that analogy about idiots. Paraphrased.

Never argue with Pussies, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you with their experience <laugh>
 
See I don't want to come across bias...so will let the lads decide...but it's fair to say Piskie got done like a kipper on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Ern
Big Ern said:
well, technically you have offered HIAG any bet he wants, and he's named it and given the parameters, in a court of law, cut & dried.
Click to expand...

... the natural extension to that is that Quentin could therefore set parameters that guarantee him winning ...<doh>

... and being pedantic ...Piskie said he'd accept 'any bet' ... not 'any forfeit' restrictions put forward by Precious Noballs ... you have to first win the bet for the forfeit to apply <ok>

Comes down to the same old same old ... Quentin is a very poor loser ... he cannot take the thought of anybody 'enjoying' getting the better of him ... quite sad to be so insecure, let's face it <cheers>
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Spurlock said:
See I don't want to come across bias...so will let the lads decide...but it's fair to say Piskie got done like a kipper on this one.
Click to expand...

Do you remember Quentin accepting my bet about us getting relegated then crying that he hadn't understood it when he lost? ... some consistency please ...

[HASHTAG]#NoToNepotism[/HASHTAG] ... <cheers>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
FosseFilberto said:
Do you remember Quentin accepting my bet about us getting relegated then crying that he hadn't understood it when he lost? ... some consistency please ...

[HASHTAG]#NoToNepotism[/HASHTAG] ... <cheers>
Click to expand...
Did he lose? I don't think he accepted it. Plus, IIRC even if he had the bet would still be running, as, like Piskie, you worded the terms poorly.
 
FosseFilberto said:
... the natural extension to that is that Quentin could therefore set parameters that guarantee him winning ...<doh>

... and being pedantic ...Piskie said he'd accept 'any bet' ... not 'any forfeit' restrictions put forward by Precious Noballs ... you have to first win the bet for the forfeit to apply <ok>

Comes down to the same old same old ... Quentin is a very poor loser ... he cannot take the thought of anybody 'enjoying' getting the better of him ... quite sad to be so insecure, let's face it <cheers>
Click to expand...

Slurp slurp.
 
FosseFilberto said:
Do you remember Quentin accepting my bet about us getting relegated then crying that he hadn't understood it when he lost? ... some consistency please ...

[HASHTAG]#NoToNepotism[/HASHTAG] ... <cheers>
Click to expand...

This is not about you Fosse.

All I said was Piskie got done like a kipper...my Betz for Bantz franchise comes with its own rules and regulations hence why yesterday during office hours I replied to Piskie 'i understand' 'im with you' or words to that affect.

Lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD, Libby and PINKIE
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back