Nations League Poll

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Good, bad or indifferent?


  • Total voters
    47
I wasn't too sure about it when it was announced but actually I think it's worked really well. It gives the smaller nations a real chance of a play off spot for Euro 2020 qualifying. Wembley was great on Sunday. A much better atmosphere than what there would have been for a regular friendly.
 
Has a couple of edges that need chipping off and smoothing up, but that'll happen in the next couple of iterations I suspect.

But, better than meaningless friendlies and I like the concept and how this first iteration has played out.
 
Have enjoyed it from the beginning and, although it's even better that we got to the semi-finals, I would still have voted it a good idea if we'd gone out. Even the relegated teams will have good opposition in the lower groups, so the next tournament will still be interesting for them...spiced by the chance of promotion again.
 
Think it will be better when they finally make international breaks longer and reduce the frequency of them too, could play out a group stage in one break... could be exciting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qwerty
Think it will be better when they finally make international breaks longer and reduce the frequency of them too, could play out a group stage in one break... could be exciting.

That's not a bad idea. There are currently four in-season international breaks (I think?) that are effectively two weeks each; compress that to two three-week breaks, one in autumn, one in early spring. You could play the four games of a group stage over the course of 17-18 days, it would mean less travel for players from outside Europe, and the time 'saved' could be used to provide a proper winter break. Think you've just earned yourself a £5m retirement package.
 
That's not a bad idea. There are currently four in-season international breaks (I think?) that are effectively two weeks each; compress that to two three-week breaks, one in autumn, one in early spring. You could play the four games of a group stage over the course of 17-18 days, it would mean less travel for players from outside Europe, and the time 'saved' could be used to provide a proper winter break. Think you've just earned yourself a £5m retirement package.

I'll start a just giving page.
 
Could not care less about International football. There´s too much of it disrupting the flow of the season. Having said that, it is good that the 4 finalists are not the usual suspects.
 
not watched any of them so I voted bad. Just not interested in them. They are still friendlies.