Good spot, I didn’t see the date, clearly a pre referendum survey thing. Ok here’s an analysis based on the actual vote by ward https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38762034 We clearly have a different idea of what ‘irony’ is. Anyway, you’ll just love this, it’s very funny. Well, it is for us members of the sneering elite. Thank you Bobby, I hate your avatar.
how can you hate my avatar, its john terry balling his eyes out after he slipped over and lost the champions league (i lost a bet on the PL board). Shouldn't you be loving that?
I hope that is not another dig at me Stroller? I think common sense would have been a better example. It's not really a good advert for Cambridge though.
The thing that irks about that chart is Graduates v Highest qualification GCSE or lower. What a bunch of patronising twats. Without some of those workers with GCSE's or lower our country wouldn't have certain services. And people cant understand why Brexiteers get P'd off. Twats
The more you post the more you sound as though you have a massive chip on your shoulder. Why not give it a rest? Just once in a while. Or should we just refer to you as the Neymar of the QPR Not 606 Forum.
Just another left wing unfunny "comedian". Expect to see him on 'Have I got news for you' and other left wing, Tory bashing, so called satirical programmes any time soon.
That's nice coming another remoaner. What's the matter do you not like hear another side of an argument? If you don't like it ignore. Simple
It's just a shame that someone can post something that really is patronising and as soon as you comment the usual suspects tell you to give it a rest. Maybe if the didn't post crap like that they wouldn't get a response.
We could. But you'll all flounce off soon enough. I know. I've heard it all before. We're all patronising twats and muppets and you are all simply telling it as it really is - be nice if we had some facts instead of the collection of soundbites , buzzwords and catch phrases.
Does that mean that 5% of UKIP supporters voted remain? I don't think I'll upset too many by calling that demographic spectacularly ****ing stupid.
Not necessarily, as bc7 pointed out that was based on a pre referendum poll. More accurate detail (sadly not including what paper people read or political party they vote for) in the BBC link I posted later.
But those are much less informative and so not as fun to draw silly inferences. Granted they're more accurate in terms of representing the results but still don't prove that a count of leaver voters over 60 without qualifications is necessarily more than zero.
