2020VisionofLeeds
Well-Known Member
NoAre you from north or east yorkshire by any chance ?
But I am from Yorkshire unlike you, manc-boy
NoAre you from north or east yorkshire by any chance ?
Maybe that's the problem then,I've noticed you all like to change the subject to gay things and spank mags when you lose a discussion.Why is that ?No
But I am from Yorkshire unlike you, manc-boy

A real pompous law stitch up on the cards again.Update on Tommy's court case, Judges say they need time to deliberate and will try their best to do it before end of July.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...sentence-latest-a8452271.html?page=1#liveblog
A real pompous law stitch up on the cards again.
It was CreweMaybe that's the problem then,I've noticed you all like to change the subject to gay things and spank mags when you lose a discussion.Why is that ?
ps I think you are the only one of us that's lived in manchester,manc.![]()
It was Crewe
But that’s Manc land, I agree with you
Wales Manc-land it’s all the same, scum boys everywhereIt’s fooking wales and ur both wrong
was it fook Crewe,you wouldn't get through pasport control.No word has it you're a Salford red.It was Crewe
But that’s Manc land, I agree with you
Another one at it,what is it with youIt’s fooking whales and ur both wrong
gays,spank mags and now fooking whales.Fookin wierdoesI draw the line at ****ing weirdosAnother one at it,what is it with yougays,spank mags and now fooking whales.Fookin wierdoes
I was talking to your other half,you are the one who put yourself in the category.I draw the line at ****ing weirdos
So most on here are safe
What are you not sucking up this time...
Somebody that wants to stop you ****s wrecking the country and this is how you thank them...
Most!!!!!I draw the line at ****ing weirdos
So most on here are safe

This article is very interesting, and somewhat hypercritical.
The Judges allowed people to make live tweets etc in the court room, then, after they leave to deliberate, they put a reporting gag on the case......it don't make sense, that's saying 2 + 2 = 5.
They say if a Jury takes a long time to come to a decision, it is more in favour of a not guilty verdict that guilty, I think the same could be said for the 3 Judges.
The fact they have to go and deliberate says there are flaws in how the last trial was conducted, and whether Tommy is / was in fact guilty of anything.
It's also been said the deliberation is because 1 Judge wasn't in favour of a verdict in favour of Tommy Robinson, not sure if that's correct or not, so can't speculate.
The link put up by DBC, and a later updated version by myself is not the whole transcript of the case, many more things were put forward by, and debated by Tommy's team. What did seem to come out in court was the disgusting way Tommy was treated, and how he was forbidden his due process, something Judge Marsons admitted later. I'm sure that is something the 3 Judges will take a close look at.
You must log in or register to see media
So who would you ****?I draw the line at ****ing weirdos
So most on here are safe
