Where did I calculate anything?
Anyone else think Ashley Williams is mad to think he's going to be fit
Fixed
IT beat me to it though i was going for
Stop laughing.....
It's 5th actually - and he shared 8th place finish with Rodgers. HIs only 2complete seasons average is 4th.
10th
Firstly he had a 1 year deal at Watford with an option of a second.As you know I don't watch other teams so I know little about them. When something comes up on here that I know little or nothing about, I go and read about it [from good sources] before I comment. I learned that Silva started with some great results at Watford. 10 games in, Everton came calling and there was a dramatic change in results and performances. In all press conferences he refused to commit to Watford [who gave him a 2 year deal, not one year]. Rightly or wrongly the Watford board felt he had disrespected them and was showing no loyalty, so they too didn't need to show any, hence the sacking. In fairness all reports say he never lost the dressing room, the players speak highly of him.
Maybe my downed tools comment was wrong but I can't think of the right phrase that means couldn't be bothered and so didn't try very hard.
Oh the joys of stats which tell you anything you like.
Curious that the averages are from 87 to 99 when Chelsea were in the top division, making cup finals and winning trophies in the latter few years of that whilst City were languishing in the second division for a few of those years, winning nothing...wonder if that helps pad those figures up. And they were still only 6k less on average! Christ, what a useless set of average figures.
Oh the joys of stats which tell you anything you like.
And why mention capacities? When the 90s came around and all stadiums had to become all seater, they both had there abouts 34k seater stadiums and have increased at different points in their history. So unless you want to work out %attendance of capacity for every year, it's a bit of a non-discussion point.(For the record, I worked out a few random dates from between 1970 to 1995 and actually City have a higher %, but shhh, don't let that spoil your stats)
Obviously both sides had inflated attendance figures when they started getting more success and obviously it grew as stadiums increased in capacity.
What you need to look at is the figures pre-success like 1970 to lets say 1995 when both sides were ****e, neither having any lasting success and neither having any sizable boost in income because that shows you which club has been the better support throughout all of its history - the hard times as well as the good times. Quick eyeballing suggests that actually City might have had a bigger average attendance looking at it that way before all of the success and money which was my initial point. Thanks.
Not really sure you understand how stats work, or you were more drunk than you thought.
And when did that stop him playing in your back line before?
