The John Terry Clause

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Amin Arrears

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2011
41,456
19,494
113
26
The moon
John Terry apparently will only sign a contract extension for villa if he has a clause that says he won't play against Chelsea...

“I genuinely hope he [Terry] triggers it,” said Bruce. “All those phone calls to him last summer, he hasn’t been disappointed with it. From the training ground, to the stadium, to the support, it has all the makings of a big club.

“I’m sure he will give it a good go if we get promoted and enjoy the challenge of it. We’ll not pick him against Chelsea if that’s he wants."


Both fat ****ing Bruce and Terry need to get a bastard grip, what a complete and utter piss take. I didn't think I could dislike either of them any more than I already did but this is a whole new level of ****itude. <doh>
 
I wouldn't want to play against city. Its fair enough. Would he want to stop Chelsea getting a title, no so he's a ****, although he is still a huge arrogant ****.
 
If City were (just go with me here) in a position where a win would win them the PL, and I played for the opposition, as much as I would want City to beat us, I would still play and try to win for my team.

He's a ****, pure and simple.
 
When reading the title of the thread , I thought the 'John Terry clause' would be all about including shagging your team mate's wife/girlfriend. Get the ****er in jail and do Cahill for ABH. Set of wide boy ****s.
 
Steve Bruce is equal parts bellend, as if we didn't know that already, just for being happily complicit with such monstrously ****ish behaviour.

Then he'll become an even bigger **** when he goes back on his stupid word and moans about not having Terry available after they lose to Chelsea.
 
We agreed something similar as part of Fryatt's transfer didn't we? That Leicester wouldn't agree the deal before January 1st when we were due to play them?