It would be hypocritical of me to pretend I don't understand what you are saying Yorkie. Deep breath. However. We are all different. We all post in very different styles and there are people who wind each of us up massively - I know there are many who find my posts noxious. However with SH because he is virtually alone on here in his views he gets knocked by almost everyone. Lots of those are quite personal too. We tell him his ideas are not his but from the Mail or wherever, we demand he gives more detail, we don't like that his style is to make a sarcastic comment often and so on. But it is still him. Without him this forum has virtually no debate - it reminds me of the old joke where in a monastery monks told jokes by numbers because they had heard them all before. I have found that when I ignore the things I dislike and only comment on anything that gives me an excuse to puff out my own rubbish I can engage with him as easily as with anyone else.I don't think anyone disagrees.... but being abusive and winding people up is not the way to do it....I think also there is a range of views and it is not good to polarize and stereotype![]()
If we are honest he too suffers from people being abusive towards him and winding him up - is our excuse just that he deserves it? Perhaps - but how much fun is it debating with someone who agrees with you?

