I think regardless of whether the roles were reversed or not, the incident should have been investigated after the race. I think though, it was just a racing incident. Kobayashi was alongside him but couldn't hit the brakes anymore or turn left and he just tried to re-pass Hamilton (as he does)but Hamilton was looking in the wrong mirror, was taking the racing line, but looking in the direction of the corner he was about to go into
Everybody knows that Kobayashi never gives up and nearly always tries to repass when overtaken, Hamillton made a school boy error and assumed Koby was done for, and as we all know assumption is the mother of all **** ups. Why is it Lewis has been involved in one way or another so many accidents this year? Is he becoming THE CRASH KID?
A racng incident, Hamiltons fault though for assuming he was long passed Kamui, and Kamui's race was pretty much ruined after. and ab, the situation with Hamilton/Konay isn't the same as Webber/Vettel, as Hamilton had the whole track and could've stayed on his line, where as in Turkey the replays show Webber was continually pushing Vettel onto the grass and had left Vettel no option. edit: becoming the crash kid? he always was, he'd already crashed more times than Vettel previous to this season.
That's an excellent point, in Canada, Hamilton was up the inside (not far enough to make a pass like Kobi today) and him and Button collided, and Hamilton got the blame. Hamilton was ahead of Kobi coming into the corner, Kobi did not need to brake that late, so therefore Kobi had no right to be there and yet there is a debate about whos fault it was?? I'd still call it a racing incident because Hamilton could of looked in his mirrors but Kobi is just as much to blame.
Amazing Miggins, once again you have somehow managed to blame Webber for something no-one even cares about or is talking about. Your abilities astound me. But while we're on the subject, Vettel drifted right. End of story.
I do not want to start this but seriously look at a reply, Webber kept his line and Vettel moved over.
Because Vettel this season keeps starting on pole so doesn't have to overtake anyone ;-) You make a mistake and Hamilton goes for it, he's a racer. Last season Vettel was involved in a lot of incidents, so was Schumi in his older days (and some with Mercedes), maybe that's what makes a good racer one that takes chances and goes for every opportunity and risks?
Kobi is not to blame at all, what can he do if someone who is supposed to be turning right decides to move left instead? And don;t try and compare it to Canada, you didn't have the spray to contend with, Hamilton ****ed up, pure and simple. Yes the onus is on the overtaking driver, but you can't blame him if he keeps his car in a straight line. Lizard, Vettel had 2 accidents last season, how many did Lewis have?
Kobayashi got into Hamilton's slipstream and had every right to maintain his position on the track. He can't be expected to back off because Hamilton assumes he is ahead but doesn't check his mirrors. Unless Hamilton was a full car length ahead of Kobayashi, he shouldn't have moved across and turned into Kobayashi.
Racing incident, but if anybody points the finger it's at Hamilton turning into Kamui and ruining his own race, Kamui held his line and Lewis knew he was there, sorry but I agree with Lauda for once.
If he was a full car length ahead of Kobayashi, then shurely he's allowed to move in front of him. Is it me or has the meaning for a full car length changed?
Only one driver gets to start from pole per race so by your assumption if the other 23 drivers were any good they would all be crashing into each other. Jenson has made some incredible overtakes this year just look at todays race very forceful and managed to hit no one so he must be crap.
Think I'm done here... It was one of those things. Had those roles been reversed the opinion would be that Hamilton is dangerous, arrogant, going to kill somebody and what was he thinking being there, just as it is now. I really have no interest in arguing the point over a racing incident that stewards saw no reason to investigate. As I stated in my first response... I'm just glad that there was no injury.
Never said Hamilton didn't, saying Vettel is involved in incidents as well, other winning drivers are. The argument is an answer to the question why Hamilton is involved in so many incidents, is this what makes them great drivers?
That was a joke about Vettel, hence the wink. Some drivers take more risks, those drivers are more likely to be involved in incidents, Vettel one of them, but he's not had to take any this year because he's started pretty much from the front of the grid. I'm not berating Vettel or Hamilton or Schumi, I'm just saying IMO that these drivers are involved in more incidents because they take more risks. Button had a great drive today and it's races like this he really shines in his talent, but he is more cautious, sometimes it gets him wins and podiums and sometimes it doesn't.
Well Button has done the most overtakes this year and has not hit anyone while doing so, which shows he is not the cautious driver people lable him as and also that you can overtake a lot without crashing.
It's nothing to do with hate, the lad made a mistake. Simple. As for the question in the poll, I'm not sure. They should investigate every incident. I assume they were in touch with the McLaren pitwall and they said they had no qualms with Kobayashi.
My reply was very much tongue in cheek, the sort of comment I would make if we were chatting about it in a pub, Its just my sense of humor no offense meant.
