... think about what you are saying.
Did either Piskie or Ginger publish HIAG's (already publcly available) personal information on the open forum? No ... more likely it was Sucky because he had stated that he was going to do it in advance ... so why the fcuk should either Ginger or Piskie be banned? For visiting HIAG's public Facebook page and finding the truth that would crush them to be anything but and, instead, pretty funny - given the spin HIAG had put on his real world existence?
Have a word with yourself .. what should brb do? .. tell the boys to be more sensitive around poor HIAG? ...ban them for laughing at that crushing truth?![]()
Pretty much sums it up.
HIAG's ego, and that of the Wee Wee club, has been bruised.
I dont condone linking personal **** of others on here, and should people persist, they should be banned. Now that the rule has been set.
I just fail to see what HIAG whining about Piskie and Ginge not being banned is going to achieve.
How does he even know it was them?
And I will repeat, has anything we have seen from brb in all these years lead anyone to believe that the way to win him round is to whine and moan constantly? HIAG is more likely to get himself banned that way.
People transgressed, people have been warned.
brb does get pissed off when people dont agree with him, but guess what, this isn't the ****ing UN, we dont all get a vote in everything.
Its an internet forum and he is in charge, thats it, pure and simple.

I explained why that was not really a validation for plastering it on here.