Adkins out

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I'll copy the post I stuck up on the MDT as its relevant here too:

Here are some stats

Under Slutsky

Played 20, Won 4, Drawn 7, Lost 9. Scored 34 Conceded 37, goal difference -3.

0.95 points per game, 32% of available points, 20% win ratio.

Scored 1.7 goals per game, conceded 1.85 goals per game.




Under Adkins

Played 9, Won 1, Drawn 4, Lost 4. Scored 5, Conceded 8, goal difference -3.

0.77 points per game, 25% of available points, 11% win ratio.

Scored 0.55 goals per game, conceded 0.88 goals per game.





So to sum it up, we are now winning nearly 50% less games, picking up 20% less points, scoring 68% less goals, and conceding 52% less goals per game. Speaks for itself who was doing the better job, no?
Bump. How's it looking now bob
 
Bump. How's it looking now bob

I said on here I didn't think anyone else would get any better out of the team than Sluts was getting. With the available squad right now is I was/am wrong.

Under Slutsky

Played 20, Won 4, Drawn 7, Lost 9. Scored 34 Conceded 37, goal difference -3.

0.95 points per game, 32% of available points, 20% win ratio.


Under Adkins

Played 24 Won 8 Draw 7 Lost 9

Points per game 1.23, 43% of available points, 33.3% win ratio

Who knows what Sluts would be doing right now if he was still here but I think I'd have to admit probably not quite as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
I said on here I didn't think anyone else would get any better out of the team than Sluts was getting. With the available squad right now is I was/am wrong.

Under Slutsky

Played 20, Won 4, Drawn 7, Lost 9. Scored 34 Conceded 37, goal difference -3.

0.95 points per game, 32% of available points, 20% win ratio.


Under Adkins

Played 24 Won 8 Draw 7 Lost 9

Points per game 1.23, 43% of available points, 33.3% win ratio

Who knows what Sluts would be doing right now if he was still here but I think I'd have to admit probably not quite as well.

That's unfair Adkins has conveniently had more games and Hernandez available for a good chunk of them.
 
That's unfair Adkins has conveniently had more games and Hernandez available for a good chunk of them.

I think the truth for football managers is that the job is pretty much unfair.

Who knows what might of been if we'd had less (critical) injuries or done the January business in August. (or had owners who gave a ****)

I honestly think Sluts could have been a great manger for us given different circumstances but we'll never know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
The main difference here is that many seemed to welcome Slutsky (particularly those who loved Silva I expect) as he'd managed the Russian national team, and many hated the Adkins appointment even though he's had experience at this level. Many people were patient with Slutsky despite constantly and predictably caving in at the end of games. And many demanded Adkins make immediate improvements despite the mess. Slutsky brought more people in during his transfer window and had a full preseason. Several players like Irvine, Aina, Dawson have done better under Adkins. I expect Kingsley won't look a terrible player either.

When you bring in new defenders you need to get the defence organised. The excuse for Slutsky was that he attacked and that made the defence weaker, but the reality was the defence was simply unorganised and the goals could dry up under him and we'd still concede.
 
Last edited:
Slutsky should never have got the job
totally clueless in this league.
If he had stayed we would be joining the mackem's in League 1.