Off Topic Trumpy pumpy.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Muppetfinder General said:
You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
IMG is all I see

If you resorted to a meme, well, that's all I need to sort you into the correct classification.
You just personified the very thing I was frustrated with. Political\ideological partisan gibberish that flies against objectivity and substantive analysis
 
This is officially the most I have ever conversed with you ever on here.

I used to think you were quite sharp, seems you are just another moronic ideologue
 
This thread in a nutshell

Students Hate Trump's SOTU Quotes...Until They Find Out That They're Actually Obama's
You must log in or register to see media

Clinton Supporters Agree With Donald Trump Quotes
You must log in or register to see media
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: terrifictraore
PhheHdee said:
Dr Robert Epstein paper on manipulated search results
The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections
http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/112/33/E4512.full.pdf

How Google Could Rig the 2016 Election - Politico, very left leaning
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/how-google-could-rig-the-2016-election-121548

Dr Robert Epstein, Berkeley, liberal btw not conservative
Google algorithms were manipulated to favour Hillary.
You must log in or register to see media

According to his research the most vulnerable demographic to this manipulation was moderate conservatives

He's correct of course, google manipulates the results of searches based on partisan politics. This has been known for quite some time.
The paper above is 2014, his research since has proven google were actively trying to get Hillary elected simply by analysing other search engine results compared to google. Other search engines like Bing returned what people were searching for, Google returned positive Hillary results consistently as top ranked.

I know google do this with science too, I've done my own research on that.
2 sites are an example, one left leaning one right leaning.

Right leaning site gets millions of hits in traffic per month, it is the most viewed blog on that topic in the world (received several top science blog on the internet awards) Does open peer review of papers, where scientists contribute
Left leaning site. Fraction of the traffic, no awards and has been embroiled in several scandals.

This pertains to scientific information in graphic form.
The left leaning site (even today) comes up in searches in images on google at a 1000\1 ratio compared to the much more successful right leaning site.

In fact for most searches, to find data from the right leaning site, I had to use the name of the site in the search
This was not true for the left leaning site, I would not use the name, and it's graphs were top of all the searches, actually multiple returns for that site per search.

The problem with Google is, it knows you. Your smart phone knows you better than almost anyone you know (on average). This is a fact.
Google collects so much information about you that it can manipulate you.

Google has become a major problem.

This has nothing to do with the gay partisan dishonest nonsense gibberish on this thread.

It's also a sad indictment of current public discourse that I have to provide left leaning sources for such things. Really sad

I have nowhere else to post this, so here it goes :)

Click to expand...

what are the two sites that you used to do your own analysis?
 
terrifictraore said:
what are the two sites that you used to do your own analysis?
Click to expand...

I'd rather keep that to myself. So you can take all of the above with a pinch of salt.
The evidence of google manipulation is provided by Dr R Epstein

Also in the analysis, upon searching the name of one in a google search, the left leaning, the first 10 links are all from the site or positive about the site
The right leaning one 2 were the site and its twitter account and 8 links attacking the site.
 
On double checking the first 4 pages of searches for the left leaning site are ALL positive links I stopped at 4 pages.
<doh>

One caveat, the site could be paying Google about half a million dollars to have their links up that high, although I do not know where this site would get such money.

But the lack of negative links toward that site shows something is not right.
 
PhheHdee said:
On double checking the first 4 pages of searches for the left leaning site are ALL positive links I stopped at 4 pages.
<doh>

One caveat, the site could be paying Google about half a million dollars to have their links up that high, although I do not know where this site would get such money.

But the lack of negative links toward that site shows something is not right.
Click to expand...

I don't know how much one might pay for Google's sweet touch Win it might not be that much. Equally it depends on how many links are thry generating themselves and whom is opposing
 
Clear evidence of the UK foreign office war mongering, and I mean wtf like, there is only one winner in a war between Russia and Britain, and it's not Britain <laugh> Johnson and the Foreign office telling patent falsehoods to put Britain on a beligerent footing with a nation they could never ever afford to go to war with.
So I assume this is a NATO thing.. not just the British foreign office
https://www.channel4.com/news/factc...ie-about-porton-downs-evidence-against-russia
same foreign office giving terrorists in Syria millions of UK tax payer money
**** schools like, or services for the old, those terrorists need bombs and guns damnit
 
  • Like
Reactions: organic red
PhheHdee said:
Clear evidence of the UK foreign office war mongering, and I mean wtf like, there is only one winner in a war between Russia and Britain, and it's not Britain <laugh>
https://www.channel4.com/news/factc...ie-about-porton-downs-evidence-against-russia

same foreign office giving terrorists in Syria millions of UK tax payer money
Click to expand...

well there's deniability in there.

not much but a little

the scientists.can state they cannot determine exact source and still say its russian.... in theory. that's scientifically stating they can't say which lab.

but of course Boris could have made it all up.

it's just a **** show.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
well there's deniability in there.

not much but a little

the scientists.can state they cannot determine exact source and still say its russian.... in theory. that's scientifically stating they can't say which lab.

but of course Boris could have made it all up.

it's just a **** show.
Click to expand...


Porton down said it is not their job to tell where it was made

Johnson said they categorically said it was made there, Porton Down cannot tell that from a sample, it is impossible.
"They do,” replied Mr Johnson. “They do. And they were absolutely categorical and I asked the guy myself, I said, ‘Are you sure?’ And he said there’s no doubt.”"
No doubt it was made in Russia, they never said that at all, he made it up
 
Boris Johnson is not only a war mongering ******, there are several counts of this **** being a racist prick too, he is a racist, and I don't say that lightly
 
"But this is not the only time the government has made this claim. The Russian embassy in London has highlighted a tweet by the Foreign Office last month. The tweet said that Porton Down had “made clear” that the Novichok nerve agent was “produced in Russia”."
According to C4

That's the second claim from the Foreign office that it was categorically "made in Russia" and claimed Porton Down was the source of this claim, both were false, intentionally false MITO. can;t you see what's going on here ffs.

How much war and war mongering are you going to just accept from your own government. ffs

BBC is at the heart of this too, BBC runs more war propaganda than any other news organisation in the world via its various services, especially the World Service
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back