Let's Do The Time Warp Again!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
So if brb really wanted a mod on here that it should be anonymous so that people don't have an opinion on that person's agenda from the start. Personally I don't think we need a mod. The are lots of reasons as to why it got to this point and it's not all down to posters crossing lines.

The banned one cause us to have a mod here, go blame him, not the mod.
 
The **** off if you don't want to be part of a moderated forum. Simple really.
It's not simple. GC for example had Jip as mod and they all agreed that appointment, most boards have a mod that people were fine with. Why should this board have a mod that causes conflict from the start and why do we need a mod when we've existed without one with very few problems?
Recent events aside this place was fine
 
That’s the point. The board was always unmodernised. It should remain so.

To be fair, it pretty much will be.

When I first took on the mod role on the Hull City board, I thought I knew best, and caused a lot of ill feeling until the board users put me right. I was interfering far too much, albeit I believed for the right reasons. I thought 'I'll show 'em', and cut back moderating for a while, and the board improved no end.

Point being, I learned through listening and experience, that poking my nose in, is the worst thing to do, and it all works better if users sort it out among themselves, but it helps if there's someone at hand if things go too far against the board users wishes.

If I abuse this, I'm under no illusions that brb would ban me without hesitation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRH Custard VC
There have to be rules. End of.

Those crying for an un-modded board on one hand and arguing the porn and associating with GC are ****ing jokers. Are there rules or not ffs!

Bottom line is that they only want rules as long as they can dictate what they are. <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
There have to be rules. End of.

Those crying for an un-modded board on one hand and arguing the porn and associating with GC are ****ing jokers. Are there rules or not ffs!

Bottom line is that they only want rules as long as they can dictate what they are. <doh>
You don't even post on here often and clearly have an agenda.

This board was fine until recent events and didn't need a mod. The reasons for it getting a bit odd lie with a lot of people and not all of them are banned.
 
It's not simple. GC for example had Jip as mod and they all agreed that appointment, most boards have a mod that people were fine with. Why should this board have a mod that causes conflict from the start and why do we need a mod when we've existed without one with very few problems?
Recent events aside this place was fine
dmd hasn't caused a jot of conflict as mod. The conflict is coming from stan the snide and his crying chums. You are creating an argument from a problem that doesn't exist except in their biased heads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
There have to be rules. End of.

Those crying for an un-modded board on one hand and arguing the porn and associating with GC are ****ing jokers. Are there rules or not ffs!

Bottom line is that they only want rules as long as they can dictate what they are. <doh>


There’s always been a different set of rules for GC. Most of us have just accepted that. But, as luv says, this board ran perfectly well on a self policing basis until people started whining and cry arseing to brb.

Now he’s gone OTT. Banned users for trivial reasons, alienated some top posters.

As I put before, none of this had to happen if some people just grew a pair.

If I was brb the rules would be simple. If you come crying to me you’d better have a ****ing genuinely good reason or it’s you that’s getting the chop!..
 
Some have amply proven that they can't show self restraint.

There are mods. Let them mod and the rest get on with posting. Simples. :emoticon-0148-yes:
Some will say that self restraint was thrown out of the window once a mod got heavy. I don't want to get into that as the will be a difference of opinion but if we were asked to go back a few months the plane was fine.
Having brb on here a lot or an appointed mod will mean that it'll continue as it is now. It will not resolve the issue it will mean that the board stays like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
You don't even post on here often and clearly have an agenda.

This board was fine until recent events and didn't need a mod. The reasons for it getting a bit odd lie with a lot of people and not all of them are banned.
So now you want to also decide on people's post count and how many they need to make in order to validate their opinion?

You're not totally biased are you mate. <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman
Most don't want a mod on here it will draw negativity.

So you brought GC here.

You also reported HiaG and brought me here.

You also went on the betting boards.

You also fail to mention DMD was made mod because this board was spammed with over 20 socks, some as late after 12 last night.

Funny you only OP what fits your version of events!

You have all had opportunity to calm the situation down and only two people, non of you rabble attempted that.

Any way because those two people did make the effort i will leave you alone with clicks of Tobes and NSIS who will no doubt continue to bully Pete and Co. my absence.

This isn't a peace treaty its a Luv, NSIS and Tobes i want pact.
 
So you brought GC here.

You also reported HiaG and brought me here.

You also went on the betting boards.

You also fail to mention DMD was made mod because this board was spammed with over 20 socks, some as late after 12 last night.

Funny you only OP what fits your version of events!

You have all had opportunity to calm the situation down and only two people, non of you rabble attempted that.

Any way because those two people did make the effort i will leave you alone with clicks of Tobes and NSIS who will no doubt continue to bully Pete and Coin my absence.

This isn't a peace treaty its a Luv, NSIS and Tobes i want pact.


All I want is this board back to the way it used to be. Nothing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Some will say that self restraint was thrown out of the window once a mod got heavy. I don't want to get into that as the will be a difference of opinion but if we were asked to go back a few months the plane was fine.
Having brb on here a lot or an appointed mod will mean that it'll continue as it is now. It will not resolve the issue it will mean that the board stays like this.
Some will say that a mod got heavy when self restraint was thrown out of the window.

You already are posting stuff that highlights a difference of opinion, but only want a discussion on your terms.

I honestly believe that you are creating a problem that doesn't exist. Just make your usual banter threads and you will see. :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Some will say that self restraint was thrown out of the window once a mod got heavy. I don't want to get into that as the will be a difference of opinion but if we were asked to go back a few months the plane was fine.
Having brb on here a lot or an appointed mod will mean that it'll continue as it is now. It will not resolve the issue it will mean that the board stays like this.

As it was previously, I barely looked at the other threads and stuck to the politics one. I don't see any reason why I'd change from that, and I'd only need to look if people flagged something, so the board can pretty much be as you want it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.