The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Cricinfo say that us and Notts lead the race for Northeast. I'd imagine Notts will get him though - having originally thought they had Jennings in the bag from Durham, they presumably have such wage capacity still very much available.
Would be a great signing if we could get him - would improve us in all formats.
 
Would be a great signing if we could get him - would improve us in all formats.

I'd suggest that the timing of him announcing that he wants to leave Kent for a D1 team is linked to him missing out on selection for the NZ test squad. Seems on odd time to do it now, otherwise. The batting hardly fired in the Ashes, or throughout last summer for that matter, and Northeast will probably feel that he could have hardly scored any more runs for Kent last year. So to still not get called, moving to a D1 would appear to be pretty essential.

Worcs will probably be in D1 for one season only. Somerset I doubt could afford him. Essex, despite being champions, are hardly rich either. Lancs have already signed Jennings (and re-signed Chanderpaul for a further year). Yorkshire are attractive and in need of another batsmen, but are in serious debt.

Surrey are the ones though that I'd expect to be at the front of the queue along side us and Notts. Richest club on the circuit, may be missing Stoneman and Roy for large periods throughout the season, and don't have Sangakkara returning.
 
ECB have cleared Ben Stokes to play in the series v NZ on the grounds that the legal case will be long winded and they consider it not proportionate to suspend him that long.

Out of interest I looked up what constituted affray....it is violence directed at 1 or more people where bystanders not involved are in fear of being hurt...such as in a public place or crowded venue. If only the people involved fear being hurt (i.e. the victims) it is not affray. Affray is usually dealt with at a Crown Court so a serious charge.
When Jonathan Woodgate was convicted of affray he got 100 hours community service and from memory that was a rather more unpleasant incident than the Stokes one. It'll be interesting be to see whether Stokes gets a similar sentence.
 
When Jonathan Woodgate was convicted of affray he got 100 hours community service and from memory that was a rather more unpleasant incident than the Stokes one. It'll be interesting be to see whether Stokes gets a similar sentence.
It will be interesting to see if he is guilty or not guilty....
 
It will be interesting to see if he is guilty or not guilty....
I suppose so but having seen that video of him in a public place throwing quite a lot of punches in a short space of time (several of them pretty wild swings) it's hard to see him being found not guilty. Could happen I guess.
 
I suppose so but having seen that video of him in a public place throwing quite a lot of punches in a short space of time (several of them pretty wild swings) it's hard to see him being found not guilty. Could happen I guess.


Maybe he was swatting midges ?

And the men just got in the way ?

I mean , it was dark ...
 
I suppose so but having seen that video of him in a public place throwing quite a lot of punches in a short space of time (several of them pretty wild swings) it's hard to see him being found not guilty. Could happen I guess.
Not guilty may be unlikely if there is video evidence, but he has pleaded not guilty so presumably he is claiming provocation or claiming it was ABH rather than affray....the latter having the higher punishment. Perhaps he would have pleaded guilty to a lesser charge.
 
I think you mean Buttler <whistle>

Woakes got over 53
Correct....mind wandered because I had turned back to the tennis and saw Edmund take 2nd set. Great performance from both men, but so glad Buttler got his 100. Didn't look like England would set a decent score....must be favourites to win, though to be honest if the results were reversed I would still think England could chase 302. However, the Aussies don't have our batting depth....or is that tempting fate:bandit: BTW..Kyle 3-0 up in 3rd set.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Number 1 Jasper
Correct....mind wandered because I had turned back to the tennis and saw Edmund take 2nd set. Great performance from both men, but so glad Buttler got his 100. Didn't look like England would set a decent score....must be favourites to win, though to be honest if the results were reversed I would still think England could chase 302. However, the Aussies don't have our batting depth....or is that tempting fate:bandit: BTW..Kyle 3-0 up in 3rd set.


James Taylor thinks 280 was par . So we can do this . Need to get finch out early I feel .