Connor Wickham?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
P.T.N

P.T.N

Active Member
Jan 29, 2011
3,562
3
38
York
Evening guys.

Just a question out of curiosity really. But why the hell did Bruce not start Wickham from the start? Was there some reasoning behind it, or is Bruce just that much of a tit?

This would have been a perfect game for him to start in, and pick up some confidence. Maybe even score a goal or two.
 
Only he knows im afraid, I think every single one of us, even the most staunchest of Bruce Supporters are thinking WTF!!!
 
Even as a Newcastle fan im utterly bewildered by his selection. His claims to take the cup seriously, and is seemingly trying out a attacking midfielder in a striking role.

Sort of disrespectul to Brighton in a way. Claim to take the cup's seriously, and then just use the game as a tryout.
 
How the **** can you not start a forward. 2 defenders and 8 midfielders I'm surprised he played a ****ing keeper.
 
It's a cunning plan to fool Swansea this Saturday . . . . . I hope.

If we lose there , followed by Chelski , then watch the Bruce out campaign gain a lot of new members.
 
PhilThompsonsNose said:
Evening guys.

Just a question out of curiosity really. But why the hell did Bruce not start Wickham from the start? Was there some reasoning behind it, or is Bruce just that much of a tit?

This would have been a perfect game for him to start in, and pick up some confidence. Maybe even score a goal or two.
Click to expand...

Pass...........maybe he just lost the plot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back