If £75 million can't lure him out of hiding nothing will ...............
Niko Kranjcar's looking for his boots as we speak
If £75 million can't lure him out of hiding nothing will ...............
Or we could already be speaking to managers so won't sack him without having someone ready to step in.
We could be, yeah. If we are, we'd have to be absolutely certain that the new guy is likely to oversee an instant improvement in performances. I don't really subscribe to the view that a 'new manager bounce' is either inevitable or very likely.
Statistically, teams that replace their managers mid season tend to get relegated. Well, when I say 'statistically', I don't have those statistics to hand. It happens a lot though.

That sounds an awful lot like my 'statistically you're better off finishing second in the championship' stat, I've never actually checked it out but it seems to be they perform better alot
For every team that changes manager and goes down, there's a team who changes and will see a huge improvement.
Pulis.....MiddlesboroughEvery team that appoints Sam Allardyce seems to get a huge improvement. Unfortunately, we've missed that particular boat. There's still Pulis though...
Every team that appoints Sam Allardyce seems to get a huge improvement. Unfortunately, we've missed that particular boat. There's still Pulis though...
. I have never got why some people don't rate him , as a manager , I get that he seems a bit full of himself , but what is wrong with that ?
Would be a good shout for the England job...What, Allardyce? He always seems to get results. He's been criticised - not least by West Ham's supporters - for playing a pretty 'direct' game, but I think that's unfair. He's cut his cloth to suit his means, and has shown himself to be pretty versatile when he has had the players available to him.
What, Allardyce? He always seems to get results. He's been criticised - not least by West Ham's supporters - for playing a pretty 'direct' game, but I think that's unfair. He's cut his cloth to suit his means, and has shown himself to be pretty versatile when he has had the players available to him.
Yes Allardyce . I don't know a single fan ( that I actually know ) west hams us , and a few Bournemouth supporters that have any time for him . Weird .
What, Allardyce? He always seems to get results. He's been criticised - not least by West Ham's supporters - for playing a pretty 'direct' game, but I think that's unfair. He's cut his cloth to suit his means, and has shown himself to be pretty versatile when he has had the players available to him.
Anyway I didn't think you lot wanted to deal with us anymore?
Gotta love how fickle fans are. Me included btw.
All total conjecture of course, but ss things stand at the moment, I'd be quite happy with that outcome (apart from Walcott getting injured). After finishing 15th, the club can then decide the manager's future, having given him a full season.
Alternatively, we could sack him next week with no replacement lined up, and see what that gets us.
We could be, yeah. If we are, we'd have to be absolutely certain that the new guy is likely to oversee an instant improvement in performances. I don't really subscribe to the view that a 'new manager bounce' is either inevitable or very likely.
Statistically, teams that replace their managers mid season tend to get relegated. Well, when I say 'statistically', I don't have those statistics to hand. It happens a lot though.
We have possibly left it too late. In every case but one, sacking a Premiership manager in October / November over the last 10 seasons has resulted in an improvement in form (the exception being hiring Avram Grant for Portsmouth of course!)
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/42094924
I think that statistic should really be the other way round. 'Statistically, teams that change their managers were in danger of relegation, and so sacked the manager.'
The relegation danger led to the manager change, not the other way around.