SCSA

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Bob the slob said:
IMO SCSA are blight on the club.
So Jenkins and a few others made a few bob selling shares. Good for them. They stood up and stumped up when most 'supporters' would have thrown their hands in the air and accepted non-league football.
The sale to the Yanks may or may not be a mistake but the 'supporters' had been screaming for investment that the old board couldn't supply; attempts by that board to sell the club earlier had been driven out of sight by 'suppers' whinging.
The Yank's offer was a better one for the club (on paper) than the Chinese offer (if reports are true) as the Americans had a background in stadium development and big sports club ownership.
Has Jenkins made mistakes? Yes. His most unforgivable one was backing Monk over managers. Then the Yanks wanted their man in and Guidolin was replaced by a nonentity with and USA passport. Clement should have been the answer but wasn't
Was Clement supported? £60 million says, 'Yes.'
Was the summer a foul up? Yes. but the squad should be capable of doing better than it has this season.
Has the club made mistakes? Yes.
Will replacing Jenkins with someone like Landon Donavon improve the situation? Not in my book.
If you really want to back Swansea City support the team from the terraces.
Click to expand...


Wow just wow
Funny you aim this pile of dross at the supporters, who actually care . you didn't happen to have written Huw spews notes for yesterdays programme.
They stood up , as did many other supporters who had far more to lose then those charlatans and have been richly rewarded for their philanthropy where as us mugs pay for our tickets year in and will continue to do so for as long as the Club exists , but if we all act like you then that won't be for long.
Jenkins biggest mistake in your opinion was backing Monk , to you that's more offensive than selling the Club behind the Trusts back and allowing this bunch of HEDGE FUND managers (look it up and you'll see what their aims are) to destroy the Club because that's where we're heading
The yanks offer was better tthan than the Chinese , how much exactly have the yanks "invested " in the Club ?
How much money do you think has gone into the Club over the past 7 years, ask yourself where's it all gone. , a conveyor belt of managers , poor player purchases all linked with one name .
 
  • Like
Reactions: swantastic, ValleyGraduate12, DragonPhilljack and 3 others
Bob true what you say except supporting them with hard cash....They have plenty....all of them players included.......Only Mugs would give their hard earned cash to a bunch of millionaires to watch any sport let alone kicking a bag of wind for 90 minutes.....I can do that for the price of my broadband..<laugh>
 
Reply |
Today, 08:59
[email protected]
...
Hi All
A few of you have mentioned donations and supporting the activities of the SCSA.
We have now a formulated plan in terms of what we will be doing and when and over the next few weeks will be asking heavily for your support where you can give it to make these plans come to fruition.
What is key though is that we are in need of funds to make them happen. They will be effective, detailed and noticeable which is the key thing for them.
With this in mind we have opened up a donations page on our website for supporters of the SCSA to place donations in. These funds will be used only for the purposes of the activities we undertake and - in the event of any surplus funds - a donation will be made to Swans4Cancer when it is appropriate to do so
We have placed a Tweet out regards the donations here - https://twitter.com/the_scsa/status/946303435699376129 and we ask that any of you with Facebook and Twitter accounts share this together with the link to the donation page at http://www.scsa.wales/donate/
Similarly if any of you wish to support this with your own donations then please do so at the link.
Thanks very much for everyone's continued support - the SCSA is very much on the move
[HASHTAG]#backtojack[/HASHTAG]
The Swansea City Supporters Alliance (SCSA)
Follow us on Twitter @the_scsa
www.scsa.wales
[email protected]
 
  • Like
Reactions: swantastic, DragonPhilljack and ValleyGraduate12
I thought that I read that the Chinese offer was better for the club and city in terms of investment but that the Yanks offered more money to Huw and co?

As I saw it at the time, they accepted the offer that was best for them and not the club?
 
  • Like
Reactions: swantastic and DragonPhilljack
I've heard that the SCSA and the Union are going to join forces in organising a mass protest etc.
 
ValleyGraduate12 said:
I've heard that the SCSA and the Union are going to join forces in organising a mass protest etc.
Click to expand...

There was meeting held last night to discuss the strategy of the SCSA ,I can say that both parties have not officially aligned with each other but further meetings are planned and I can say there will be an organised protest in the very near future.
One of the aims of the SCSA is to peacefully remove Jenkins, Morgan, Dineen and Van Zweden from the Club's hierarchy and to do that a fighting fund is needed to purchase visual aids such as literature ,banners and stickers but not restricted just to those items. The message has to get out to a wider audience more than just football forums, although useful a lot of social media is instant such as Twitter and Instagram so expect to see a lot more information via those types of media outlet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DragonPhilljack and ValleyGraduate12
ValleyGraduate12 said:
I thought that I read that the Chinese offer was better for the club and city in terms of investment but that the Yanks offered more money to Huw and co?

As I saw it at the time, they accepted the offer that was best for them and not the club?
Click to expand...

The sellouts were desperate to sell and Jenkins even admitted he didn't exactly know who the buyers were, so how was a due diligence test undertaken is a mystery.
The previous offer by American buyers Moores and Noell was dismissed by the Trust and didn't get past their diligence tests , hence Jenkins and Co kept the next pair of shysters offer from the Trust even though there was and still is a Shareholders agreement which states that all shareholders have to be offered equal opportunity to sell their shares at the same price .Jenkins didn't want that as he knew that by surrendering his and others voting rights as part of the deal that made the Trust voting rights less than useless as now the Yanks would hold the majority .
 
  • Like
Reactions: DragonPhilljack, swantastic and ValleyGraduate12
.
Reply |
Today, 20:35
Swansea City Supporters Alliance ([email protected])
...


On Friday, 22 December 2017 09:49:39 UTC, MattG wrote:
You may be aware that the SCSA intends producing some sort of literature which it is hoped can be distributed in the near future . As part of this, we want to give you, the supporters, the opportunity to contribute and to share your undoubted passion for the SCSA cause.
What we are looking for is a brief statement (no more than 50 words) explaining why you feel you want to be part of the SCSA. Whilst many of us may have similar motivations for getting involved, there is nothing stronger than hearing that in people's own words.
Of course, there is no obligation on anyone to get involved - some people might prefer to keep their thoughts to themselves - but if you would like to be a part of this, please send your statement in a reply to this email. If you can also tell us how you would like your identity to be shown alongside your statement (real name, alias, Twitter handle, email address, whatever) then that would also be useful.
If anyone prefers to send their statement privately, please send back to me direct.
Due to space constraints, we can't promise to include all responses but everything that comes back will be at least published on the website (subject obviously to compliance with the relevant laws of the land!).
Thanks in advance for your contributions and for your continued support of SCSA.
MattG
[HASHTAG]#backtojack[/HASHTAG]
Swansea City was a club that was almost universally admired for the way it was run off the field and the way it played the game on the field. We want that back. We want our club back. The American owners are ruining this club and so has our footballing style, that's why I joined the Swansea Supporters Alliance, to get the club back to the fans and playing good attractive football again.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 55282, DragonPhilljack and ValleyGraduate12
Is big nose a liar liar or not.

You must log in or register to see media

The interesting part is at about 25 minutes or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValleyGraduate12
ValleyGraduate12 said:
https://www.swanstrust.co.uk/2017/1...e-to-huw-jenkins-interview-with-wales-online/

Weak response from the Trust regarding Judas blatent lies about the takeover.

Now is the time to re ballot members on the legal action option.
Click to expand...
An initial press statement which imo was quick to come out , compared to it's recent history that was literally hot off the presses .But they did state "We will respond more fully on the detail in due course when we have properly considered the points made." , well one point for them to consider is this little beauty
Go to 25:40.

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValleyGraduate12
Matthew Bound Still Lurks said:
An initial press statement which imo was quick to come out , compared to it's recent history that was literally hot off the presses .But they did state "We will respond more fully on the detail in due course when we have properly considered the points made." , well one point for them to consider is this little beauty
Go to 25:40.

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...

It will be interesting to read their statement. Judas has lied again, that could be grounds of legal action.
 
ValleyGraduate12 said:
It will be interesting to read their statement. Judas has lied again, that could be grounds of legal action.
Click to expand...
Not so much he lied but failed to honour the shareholders agreement , which he incidentally tried to persuade the Trust didn't exist .That's why the Trust members have been pushing for the Trust to take legal action against the cnut
 
  • Like
Reactions: DragonPhilljack and ValleyGraduate12
The only people that matters are the owners .....everyone else are just Speak Bites and not worth the energy they put in.....The Morgans sold the club for their own benefit and that was their privilege to do, Everyone else was irrelevant, The minor shareholders, The Trust and the fans......They did what they did because they could........And It will be the same for the yanks.....No amount of worthless committees of any sort will influence the owners, It is theirs to do as they chose and everyone else are just sound bites and irrelevant ...I left the Trust because of this and many more have followed suit including its leaders as its a waste of time and money......Only the yanks can make any decisions.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back