How many times do England have to play Australia to win the game?
After waking up to that score card I'd say a zillion trillion billion
How many times do England have to play Australia to win the game?
Or Paine, Starc or even Nathan Lyon...A glimmer of hope, if they can dismiss a couple of early wickets tomorrow who know what might happen. Though you always feel someone like March or Cummins will come in and doggedly stay there.
Or Paine, Starc or even Nathan Lyon...
That's about as likely as City signing a decent manager thoughExactly, let's hope they really implode then Clarke will really get in the neck for not getting England to follow on.
That's about as likely as City signing a decent manager though![]()
Almost annoying that we've bowled so well and fought back in the second innings - I know the conditions were less favourable for the bowlers in the first innings but it looks like we've only started making a fist of it after the match has pretty much been lost? Even if we lose I think Root needs a significant contribution tomorrow otherwise it will look like a very disappointing start to the tour for him from both a captaincy and batting perspective.
Is Root another good performer that is effected by the weight of the captaincy, I guess TWT?
It feels like he's trying too hard to mark himself out as a captain - bold toss decision in this game, some unusual field placings (some of which has worked) and all the way back to the summer when he declared early giving Windies the chance to win. The problem is when you make those sorts of decisions some will pay off and some won't and I can't believe the weight of those consequences won't affect his batting at some level...
Exactly, let's hope they really implode then Clarke will really get in the neck for not getting England to follow on.