Guess not.
But, but they have won the 'lowest gate at wembley trophy'.
Guess not.
We will probably finish top 4 which mreans we have probably had more joy week in week out than most
I love all the " Big Club Spenders Fans " having a go at the non spending Spurs . The Spurs are a breath of fresh air amongst the fans of the big and foolish spending clubs... who's air flows through their ears .... it's funny![]()
Would they suit his Spurs cocksucking agenda?
I love watching my team play week in week out....nothing will change that.
Go on then Comm what cock does your agenda suck? Granted it’s not the Spurs one but what would you call it?maybe you enjoy the gangbang with Chavs and Goonz?
![]()
The past 5 seasons pverall , Arsenal have a net spend 90 times more than the Spurs...not rocket surgury bub , but try to spin it anyway you canSince Sept '16 Spurs have spent net £32m and Arsenal net £36m. Arsenal have won one trophy in that time, Spurs have won none.
Spurs:
2014/15 - £6m net profit
2015/16 - £10m net profit
2016/17 - £12m net spend
2017/18 - £20m net spend
Last four seasons suggests Spurs are spending more and more year on year now. They are not a 'non spending' club and some of their purchases certainly classify them as a 'foolish spending' club. Just because a few years ago their net spend was zero or negative doesn't mean they didn't buy foolishly. They buy just as much overpriced gash as most of big spenders, and hiding that behind a low net spend doesn't make it suddenly disappear and make Spurs a 'breath of fresh air'. Get over yourself.
League titles....its a draw , only one team spent a lot of money in the failure thoughHow many trophies has each club won in the last 5 seasons? Maybe Seabreeze wants to give those figures too.....
Why pick 5 instead of 2 unless you're trying to spin it your way?The past 5 seasons pverall , Arsenal have a net spend 90 times more than the Spurs...not rocket surgury bub , but try to spin it anyway you can
Basically the only trophies that matter are the ones that Arsenal haven't won more of than Spurs then yes?League titles....its a draw , only one team spent a lot of money in the failure though
The past 5 seasons pverall , Arsenal have a net spend 90 times more than the Spurs...not rocket surgury bub , but try to spin it anyway you can
Go back more than 5 , say 7 ... Spurs sit even better and made a bit .The big spending clubs dont have to worry about net spend , high spenders dont care about the bottom line .Why pick 5 instead of 2 unless you're trying to spin it your way?
Basically the only trophies that matter are the ones that Arsenal haven't won more of than Spurs then yes?
Even if this is true, in 4 of those 5 seasons we have finished above them and won 3 trophies compared to there zero.
That’s because some visiting ‘fans’ can’t be trusted to behave themselves.But, but they have won the 'lowest gate at wembley trophy'.
'Better'? At what? Spurs spending net zero means what exactly to you or any other Spurs fan? What do YOU get out of that? And if you're going to say that going back further in time makes it better viewing for spurs then it's also safe to say that looking forward in time Spurs are spending more and more each year. So being 'net zero spenders' and 'breaths of fresh air' is nonsense as is the idea that only others clubs foolishly waste money. And there's nowt wrong with spending money if you have it.Go back more than 5 , say 7 ... Spurs sit even better and made a bit .The big spending clubs dont have to worry about net spend , high spenders dont care about the bottom line .
'Better'? At what? Spurs spending net zero means what exactly to you or any other Spurs fan? What do YOU get out of that? And if you're going to say that going back further in time makes it better viewing for spurs then it's also safe to say that looking forward in time Spurs are spending more and more each year. So being 'net zero spenders' and 'breaths of fresh air' is nonsense as is the idea that only others clubs foolishly waste money. And there's nowt wrong with spending money if you have it.
Also, it's not the big spenders who don't have to worry about net spend. Arsenal, Liverpool and United are big spenders and yet still do have to worry about that. It's the artificially financed clubs like City and Chelsea that don't have to worry. But good for them. I'd rather have more teams of high quality in the premier league than less. Means better football to watch all round.
Anyway - trophies. Christ. Arsenal have been pretty turd for a few years now yet still have managed to win three FA Cups. If the FA Cup is that mediocre a trophy and Spurs are that good compared to Arsenal, surely they should have been able to win at least one of them?



Better at what ? ...Better at managing money in the overturn of players . Domestic Cups these days are for big spending Clubs, that are sh!ttiing the bed in League , to get back to Europe and Champion's League ....Like yourselves last season .Man City , Man U and Chelsea made a half a billion pounds the past 10 years on Champions League . As matter of fact , 10 teams share 85% of Champion League money for making it while all other teams make up 15% of the money . It's kinda funny how the " Big Spender Club " fans skip past net spend because of their " disposable Income " . Spur's are a breath of fresh air at the top where frankly , it reeks a bit .'Better'? At what? Spurs spending net zero means what exactly to you or any other Spurs fan? What do YOU get out of that? And if you're going to say that going back further in time makes it better viewing for spurs then it's also safe to say that looking forward in time Spurs are spending more and more each year. So being 'net zero spenders' and 'breaths of fresh air' is nonsense as is the idea that only others clubs foolishly waste money. And there's nowt wrong with spending money if you have it.
Also, it's not the big spenders who don't have to worry about net spend. Arsenal, Liverpool and United are big spenders and yet still do have to worry about that. It's the artificially financed clubs like City and Chelsea that don't have to worry. But good for them. I'd rather have more teams of high quality in the premier league than less. Means better football to watch all round.
Anyway - trophies. Christ. Arsenal have been pretty turd for a few years now yet still have managed to win three FA Cups. If the FA Cup is that mediocre a trophy and Spurs are that good compared to Arsenal, surely they should have been able to win at least one of them?
Perfect rimming, disengage tongue and drink thinners.Better at what ? ...Better at managing money in the overturn of players . Domestic Cups these days are for big spending Clubs, that are sh!ttiing the bed in League , to get back to Europe and Champion's League ....Like yourselves last season .Man City , Man U and Chelsea made a half a billion pounds the past 10 years on Champions League . As matter of fact , 10 teams share 85% of Champion League money for making it while all other teams make up 15% of the money . It's kinda funny how the " Big Spender Club " fans skip past net spend because of their " disposable Income " . Spur's are a breath of fresh air at the top where frankly , it reeks a bit .
