If both Schumacher and Senna were to drive at their extreme best then I think Schumacher would come out top. His ability for scarily fast lap times in a race is like nothing I've seen before or likely to see again. Senna was a miles better qualifier but Schumi was the man for the Grand Prix itself. In the modern era it's got to be Schumi for me.
That said I feel out of the 60 years of F1 history Jim Clark is the finest driver to have ever driven in an f1 car.
Also thank god xiglly isn't on this site (or is he?). I had enough ding dongs with him on the original 606 many a time which involved him calling Murray Walker senile and deluded and me calling the autosport poll he tugged out at every opportunity desperate and unrepresentative.
So McFerrari, you voted for Clark too? Quite right.
- In spite of your view of Schumacher; underneath it all, I always thought you were the discerning type!
I do believe Schumacher to be the best modern era f1 driver (sorry cosicave I know you hate him) though.
I know people will groan but seb does have similarities to Jim Clark, I didn't vote for Jim to boost Sebs profile since he would have very very big boots to fill.
They don't like the media and quite quiet, they cope best with fragile cars, smooth drivers, like to be in front, qualifiying a strong point, had teams built around them, their strong point wasn't in the field fighting but would do so if put there, didn't like to be pressured from behind. -of course who doesn't?
It's true that Vettel and Clark tend(ed) to be at the front. But a more accurate comparison with drivers on today's grid would be a mixture of Hamilton and Button: Hamilton has a Clark-like ability to drive around problems and Button is really the only driver since Damon Hill to approach Clark's legendary smoothness. Hamilton and Button both have real fighting spirit; so if you have doubts about Clark as an fighter, please read this to complete the comparison:
His ability when in traffic was unparalleled. In one of his races, a lap down after suffering an early puncture, he passed the whole field to unlap himself; and then passed them all again and would have won the race but for what I believe was a gearbox failure.
Of course he had a quick car, but that feat has never been approached by any driver before or since and included his team mate - passing him twice! And all who witnessed it were utterly dumb-founded…
Other: Yuji Ide![]()

It's true that Vettel and Clark tend(ed) to be at the front. But a more accurate comparison with drivers on today's grid would be a mixture of Hamilton and Button: Hamilton has a Clark-like ability to drive around problems and Button is really the only driver since Damon Hill to approach Clark's legendary smoothness. Hamilton and Button both have real fighting spirit; so if you have doubts about Clark as an fighter, please read this to complete the comparison:
His ability when in traffic was unparalleled. In one of his races, a lap down after suffering an early puncture, he passed the whole field to unlap himself; and then passed them all again and would have won the race but for what I believe was a gearbox failure.
Of course he had a quick car, but that feat has never been approached by any driver before or since and included his team mate - passing him twice! And all who witnessed it were utterly dumb-founded…

Been a close follower of F1 since 68, seen em all including JC and the very, very, best car controller, maybe not the best at tactics yet, in my opinion is Hamilton without question.
Who needs tactics when you can outdrive the rest of the field.