He might have looked scared, they scored soon after, he had very little to do. IT OBVIOUSLY DID EFFECT THE GAME.
How? Forest were coming back into the match just before the protest. They had started to have more possession and had a couple of decent half chances. It was nearly 10 minutes after the balls were cleared when they scored. And that came when they counter attacked after a poor cross by us. They were better than us, they kept the ball better, used the ball better and took their chances. We were poor and that had nothing to do with the protest.
It's better than Mauled by the Tigers. We did it again against Birmingham. Somebody said afterward that it's done ironically. Are these people aware that opposition fans don't know this/can't tell this and take it at face value, as the embarrassing ****pile that it is?
city fans are never really happy. last season half the posters on here were gagging for championship football. now they have it theyre still miserable ratbags.
But they aren't needed at all. There's nothing wrong with the chant, but we can't explain to the away fans that the hand thing is ironic can we? People just think we're a set of embarrassing ****ers.
That's the point of irony isn't it. If they understood it wouldn't be irony. The chant without the hand movements would just be arrogance because our sense of humour wouldn't be there.
the atmosphere at the kcom stadium is awful only really any singing coming from the north stand nowadays and i sit in the east stand
