He got into the PL because he was a part of a successful side that earnt promotion to the PL.
His contract wasn't renewed because he was the son of Steve Bruce. Ehab didn't like Bruce. Hard done by player would rather snivel and claim nepotism than earn his place in the side shocker - well, whatever next.
He's 33 now, in the twilight of his career so with most players that age they start dropping down the leagues. See Larsson.
Bruce was also injured last season, it takes time to recover from injuries. He joined Bury for a game or so to help them out.
As stated by numerous posters in support of Bruce - He never let us down and was a consistent 7 out of 10 performer. He was also tremendous at winning a tackle.
We'd be a better team than we are at present with an Alex Bruce in our defence.
Simple really.
He wasn't 33 when we had Maguire, Chester et al. But magically found himself playing. As I've said numerous times before, winning a tackle is great, it's what he did with the ball afterwards that people take issue with. I wasn't expecting some sort of miracle dribbling ability or pinpoint 100% pass rate, but he was bloody awful with the ball at his feet and couldn't pass a note on to his Mum if it was written on his head. In the modern game you need to be able to do more than just one thing, he couldn't. He was never a threat in the box either, something that our centre halves generally always have been.
As for his contract not being renewed because of who his father is, that's just hearsay. If they didn't want to spend the wages on him, they could have released him on a free transfer in January if it was down to who his Dad was.
It's amazing, 'he never let us down' is how he is remembered. Honestly, how many of our players have 'never let us down' in history? Lots. Andy Dawson never let us down, neither did Barmby or Whittle. Good, as a minimum requirement, I'd expect any player that pulls on a shirt not to let us down. That fact that he didn't isn't something to celebrate, it's an expectation.
