Do you mean you? If Klopp's targets had been landed we'd have had to pay for them. I'm sure it wasn't dependent on selling anybody - we're not Everton
I think it sounds like the money is flexible. We have money if FSG think it is a good investment. We don't have money if it's just to make up numbers. We have money but FSG arnt letting their wallets become a leaky sieve. There's probably one or two deals that are contingent on us beating the Hoff too.
Until they splurge like **** they will be accused of having no money Astro promised a 100mil net spend btw... just saying
They really are having a mare aren't they, like a toddler kicking off when you have to leave Toys R Us Surely that loyalty bonus was for the previous contract? And if not, serves your right for paying a loyalty bonus upfront!?
If there are posts you think cross the line report them. We don't always see every post so hit report and it gets flagged to us so can take action if needed
Maybe if you read every post, can't say I remember seeing anything, prob scanned over it and missed it. Some of us are lazy
Saints fans believe their club contact the board of every club they get players from to get permission to speak to the player in question. please log in to view this image
There were rumours before the end of last season that we had up to £200m to spend. I know it's paper talk, but you'd expect there'd be an element of truth to it. Also, we were fondling van Dijk's buttocks long before the Coutinho saga blew up, so all indications are that there is money to spend, but it has to be on the right players.