Are we close to Chelsea?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Who is closer to Chelsea?

  • Tottenham?

    Votes: 8 57.1%
  • Liverpool?

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • Manchester city?

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Manchester united?

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • Arsenal?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
in reality chicken eggs then came after chickens... but there were "eggs" before chickens.

that much is patently obvious.
 
You have not been posting, worried that RHC kidnapped you:laugh:.
He did ask for my number. :bandit:

Nah, I been posting less as personal **** kicked off and this kinda took the back seat. Was so bad over the weekend I hadn't seen our score until last night. <yikes>

Just need a win and hope City **** up one of their games.
 
<peacedove> Our manager Jurgen Klopp said we are close to Chelsea. If we are close our home form has been the one that let us down. Tottenham are closer according to the evidence

Chelsea won 15 at home drew 0 lost 2 Away won 13 drew 3 lost 3 Goal difference 47 points 87
Tottenham won17 at home drew 2 lost 0 Away won 7 drew 6 lost 4 Goal difference 49 points 80
Liverpool won 11 at home drew5 lost 2 Away won10 drew 5 lost 4 Goal difference 33 points 73
Man City won 10 at home drew 7 lost 1 Away won 11 drew 2 lost 5 Goal difference 34 points 72
Arsenal won 10 at home drew 7 lost 1 Away won 11 drew 2 lost 5 Goal difference 29 points 69
Man Utd won 7 at home drew 10 lost 1 Away won 10 drew 4 lost 4 Goal difference 23 points 65


Note:Chelsea, Tottenham Manchester city, Manchester united and Arsenal have one game in hand.

In short. no!
 
If we have Willian or Cesc Fàbregas in our team they are not going to be on the bench. Some time these two players are not starters in Chelsea.
 
Last edited:
Liverpool in my opinion would have won the league that year if Willian had signed.

Dunno.

I mean.. in 2013/14 it all came together when we played 41212 so where would willian have fitted in before that and wiuld we have sold suarez after biting ivanovic had we got him.

I dunno.

Would we not have bought sahko for example last day.. or at least not ilori due to funds..

Again i dunno.

All things being equal a 442 or 4231 with willian sturridge and suarez with coutinho and sterling filling in about sounds tasty but how many more goals do we score?
 
Dunno.

I mean.. in 2013/14 it all came together when we played 41212 so where would willian have fitted in before that and wiuld we have sold suarez after biting ivanovic had we got him.

I dunno.

Would we not have bought sahko for example last day.. or at least not ilori due to funds..

Again i dunno.

All things being equal a 442 or 4231 with willian sturridge and suarez with coutinho and sterling filling in about sounds tasty but how many more goals do we score?

Just looking at his work rate in that Chelsea side and his energy.

Formation is not so important as what he would have given at both ends of the field.....in my opinion
 
Brendan Rodgers got the tactics wrong, Chelsea came for a draw. We should have settled for a boring draw. Then we do not need to put ourselves under pressure against Palace.

But look at him go now at Celtic.
 
Just looking at his work rate in that Chelsea side and his energy.

Formation is not so important as what he would have given at both ends of the field.....in my opinion

yeah he's been most committed and hard working player there (why conte doesn't play him is beyond me)

and quality too on frees etc.

not sure he's that much of a double ender though :bandit: