Gonzo's Erection Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
moreinjuredthanowen said:
I'm glad i'm not the only one to notice.

This is for me far more the reason why May's been ordered to go now. she's been ordered to get the majority now while the polls are up cos the signals in the economy are not actually favorable but won't be discussed at all.
Click to expand...
Yep. They now that the hard brexit they're intent on delivering is going to cause an economic **** storm here, and the extra 2 years they're about to bag themselves will give them a couple of extra years to try and steady the ship before the 2022 election.
 
Tobes said:
Yep. They now that the hard brexit they're intent on delivering is going to cause an economic **** storm here, and the extra 2 years they're about to bag themselves will give them a couple of extra years to try and steady the ship before the 2022 election.
Click to expand...
So they are confident it can be worked through and don't intend to dump it on someone else then?
 
I am fairly sure that the intentvof eu is to park uk in limbo for years.

They will want a relatively quick resolution to enable their elections in 2019... but will slap uk wiyh massive leave bill and relocation expenses so no deal on relationship will be done.. nor is one wanted.

So things like flight zones.. oh oh...

Seriousymly... the devil is in the detail here.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
I am fairly sure that the intentvof eu is to park uk in limbo for years.

They will want a relatively quick resolution to enable their elections in 2019... but will slap uk wiyh massive leave bill and relocation expenses so no deal on relationship will be done.. nor is one wanted.

So things like flight zones.. oh oh...

Seriousymly... the devil is in the detail here.
Click to expand...
Yep, if we have to patrol our airspace against EU invasion it will cost a fortune <ok>
 
Diego said:
Yep, if we have to patrol our airspace against EU invasion it will cost a fortune <ok>
Click to expand...

I presume you know all about the common air space stuff etc and are just joking.

There is nowhere i think that we would fly to not going over eu airspace.
 
Solid_Air 2 said:
it's always nice to be appreciated
Personally the more she says the more i think stupid is more fitting.
Click to expand...

You are probably right.

The rumours of her and junker having a barney are clearly coming from the European camp to make her look bad. They have however misread the state of UK politics as the little englander will only see a shouty may as "strong"
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
You are probably right.

The rumours of her and junker having a barney are clearly coming from the European camp to make her look bad. They have however misread the state of UK politics as the little englander will only see a shouty may as "strong"
Click to expand...
she ,if for once she is being honest, really seems to have some very far retched ideas about what we can expect from the Brexit negotiations.
i almost think that her performance since calling the election would have had swung voters towards Labour if they didn't have the Corbyn , McDonnell Abbott axis of incompetence in charge <steam>
 
Solid_Air 2 said:
she ,if for once she is being honest, really seems to have some very far retched ideas about what we can expect from the Brexit negotiations.
i almost think that her performance since calling the election would have had swung voters towards Labour if they didn't have the Corbyn , McDonnell Abbott axis of incompetence in charge <steam>
Click to expand...
Behave, you always go in for far more than you expect or think acceptable and work back from there.
 
I'm no fan of Abbott and she ****ed up her numbers by what £100m? Which was unprofessional but hardly what it's being portrayed as.

The way this has been spun and wrung out by the Tory press is ****ing laughable, or at least it would be if people weren't daft enough to swallow it ffs. <doh>

The tax revenue their policies would generate is an estimated additional £2.7BN, she was £100m out on the Police numbers, so ****ing what? Is the policy of reversing some of the savage Tory cuts to Police numbers by taxing people copping for huge lumps of inheritance not a good thing? But that's all been lost, and the narrative "You can't trust Labour" has been wheeled out, and the entire policy has barely had a mention.

There's nearly 20,000 fewer Police officers in the UK since 2010, but don't worry you won't have to pay capital gains tax on your massive inheritance, so it's all gravy.

I can't believe people fall for this ****.
 
Tobes said:
I'm no fan of Abbott and she ****ed up her numbers by what £100m? Which was unprofessional but hardly what it's being portrayed as.

The way this has been spun and wrung out by the Tory press is ****ing laughable, or at least it would be if people weren't daft enough to swallow it ffs. <doh>

The tax revenue their policies would generate is an estimated additional £2.7BN, she was £100m out on the Police numbers, so ****ing what? Is the policy of reversing some of the savage Tory cuts to Police numbers by taxing people copping for huge lumps of inheritance not a good thing? But that's all been lost, and the narrative "You can't trust Labour" has been wheeled out, and the entire policy has barely had a mention.

There's nearly 20,000 fewer Police officers in the UK since 2010, but don't worry you won't have to pay capital gains tax on your massive inheritance, so it's all gravy.

I can't believe people fall for this ****.
Click to expand...

I think it is the fact that Labour have already said they would fund extra money to the NHS and schools from the same saving from reversing the Corporate Tax cuts. The total amount they have committed to spend is well in excess of the £2.7bn saving they would make. It is typical of politicians of all party's to hope the punter does not realise this, just like when they announce extra money for something, but announce it several times in slightly different ways to suggest they are spending more than they actually are.
 
Garlic Klopp said:
I think it is the fact that Labour have already said they would fund extra money to the NHS and schools from the same saving from reversing the Corporate Tax cuts. The total amount they have committed to spend is well in excess of the £2.7bn saving they would make. It is typical of politicians of all party's to hope the punter does not realise this, just like when they announce extra money for something, but announce it several times in slightly different ways to suggest they are spending more than they actually are.
Click to expand...

Says who? They've not released their fully costed manifesto yet have they?

Another one who's fallen for the spin it seems <doh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back