The discussion has nothing to do with us mate, but seeing as you've brought it up, Koeman is in his first season, and took over a squad that was unbalanced, not fit enough, poorly drilled and devoid of confidence. All we expected of him this season was to deliver something better than the bilge we'd seen for the previous 2 years under Martinez. He had a bad run but we were always in a higher position than we'd finished in the last 2 seasons. There were the fickle who were starting to gripe about him btw, mainly on the net and not at the match, but nevertheless they existed.
Back to the discussion about Klopp, he didn't field scratch sides in the EFL SF's did he? Saying 1 win in 10 is merely a fact mate, and it's his choice who he puts on the pitch in any case. You had higher expectations than us this season, and rightly so given the amount of investment that both clubs have had in recent years, the expectation being higher isn't an achievement of any sort, merely a reflection of the fiscal reality (which we hope to change in the coming years)
I pointed out your run simply because it's you I'm discussing it with and you're a fan of a team that had a shocking run but recovered and seem to have sorted yourselves out in terms of how the manager wants you to play. I was interested to see if you all went ballistic or rode it through. Why should we be expected to do any different?
It's arguable who had the higher expectations this season because in general we always have high expectations for ourselves, not in comparison to anyone else. This season your lot had a much higher expectation than last season so how we can reasonably compare our expectations against one another for this season I don't know how you would do that. I'm not interested in turning it into the evergreen money comparison argument though

Just to add our expectations have zero to do with 'fiscal reality' - go back as far as you like and tell me that we've never had sky high expectations, it's why we get the next year is our year tag.

