Off Topic The Burly Arms

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I take it you mean Dave? :bandit:

Dave was a lovely bloke btw. Even some of the Utd fans met him for a beer and said just that.

Saffy is a good poster. Are you mistaking him for Commy?

No and No.
Wont say anything about Dave. But that is who I was refering to.

And no, SAFC is a piece of ****.
 
Who reported it?
Skiddy's private life was getting revealed, my bet's on him.

P.S. I'm reading "Gone Fishing" by a new author called HIAG, good read so far.
Beats me Sky Rimmer but isn't everybody's life private away from here? As for 'gone fishing' I wrote it but the gimp plagiarises everything.
 
^^^^^ We've found the reporter <whistle>

[HASHTAG]#rumbled[/HASHTAG]

I wasn't up at 3am!!
Was in bed all day yesterday with this ****ing head cold, didn't see SAFC's ***** rant until this morning.
 
Dave was a lovely bloke btw

He would randomly attack rival fans on our board though. Yes I found that funny and would have to PM him to lay off when I was mod but he always chilled when asked and said he was just looking for a fight. Chief and him went at it a lot and they ended up going for a beer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skylarker
I wasn't up at 3am!!
Was in bed all day yesterday with this ****ing head cold, didn't see SAFC's ***** rant until this morning.

I'm supposed to take a meeting agenda to work today, but my dog ate it.
 
For clarity he is a Sunderland fan not a Southampton fan and almost certainly is not another of Quentin's sock accounts.

He's had a bit of a thing about Leicester City for a couple of seasons which started when we had our run to escape relegation (the first one <whistle>) and it looked like Sunderland might go down. He continued his ranting after we licked them in our opening game last season and started to have a very good season. He went quieter as that continued..

Seems prone to rants and implosions on the Sunderland board too... and had a particular issue in regard to 'John Carver' a toon poster (now banned) which he brought on to here.

My view is that it is great that this board is relatively unmodded but there are still boundaries and it comes down to self-moderation nand self-restraint in that regard, irrespective of 'provocation'.

Blatant rascism and accusations of criminal activity towwards other posters are just two of the things that should be unacceptable to us all. Calling someone a **** if they contravene such principles is not being 'precious' - it is merely showing a zero tolerance for what is abhorrent behaviour and anyone trying to condone such things is almost as big a cnut as the idiot making the comments in my book.

Even worse is the occasional hypocrisy of finding one form of such behaviour as inexcusable but attempting to pass the other off as 'bantz' ... particularly when the differentiator appears to be based on who the poster is / who the comments are aimed at etc..

Just my opinion and written calmly and objectively before the predictable responses start popping up.

Frankly, not bothered as to wheter anyone agrees or disagrees .. as I said, it's up to each individual. <ok>.
 
For clarity he is a Sunderland fan not a Southampton fan and almost certainly is not another of Quentin's sock accounts.

He's had a bit of a thing about Leicester City for a couple of seasons which started when we had our run to escape relegation (the first one <whistle>) and it looked like Sunderland might go down. He continued his ranting after we licked them in our opening game last season and started to have a very good season. He went quieter as that continued..

Seems prone to rants and implosions on the Sunderland board too... and had a particular issue in regard to 'John Carver' a toon poster (now banned) which he brought on to here.

My view is that it is great that this board is relatively unmodded but there are still boundaries and it comes down to self-moderation nand self-restraint in that regard, irrespective of 'provocation'.

Blatant rascism and accusations of criminal activity towwards other posters are just two of the things that should be unacceptable to us all. Calling someone a **** if they contravene such principles is not being 'precious' - it is merely showing a zero tolerance for what is abhorrent behaviour and anyone trying to condone such things is almost as big a cnut as the idiot making the comments in my book.

Even worse is the occasional hypocrisy of finding one form of such behaviour as inexcusable but attempting to pass the other off as 'bantz' ... particularly when the differentiator appears to be based on who the poster is / who the comments are aimed at etc..

Just my opinion and written calmly and objectively before the predictable responses start popping up.

Frankly, not bothered as to wheter anyone agrees or disagrees .. as I said, it's up to each individual. <ok>.

You, sir, are a smart man!
Saved me from writing almost the exact same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FosseFilberto
I'm feeling the love this morning :emoticon-0140-rofl:

The fact that I've got under Fosses skin again without even trying is even better. I'm getting used to his constant essays <cheers>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skylarker
I'm feeling the love this morning :emoticon-0140-rofl:

The fact that I've got under Fosses skin again without even trying is even better. I'm getting used to his constant essays <cheers>

You don't have the intellect to get under anyone's skin fella ... your posts tend to epitomise ignorance and ignorance is where most intolerance stems from. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodinki