My mate who's a big Burnley fan reckons they've agreed a deal for Snoddy - has anyone else heard this?
Can we substantiate this before I tell my mate to **** off!!
I wouldn't contest it if I was you.
My mate who's a big Burnley fan reckons they've agreed a deal for Snoddy - has anyone else heard this?
Can we substantiate this before I tell my mate to **** off!!
Apparently they bid yesterday.My mate who's a big Burnley fan reckons they've agreed a deal for Snoddy - has anyone else heard this?
Can we substantiate this before I tell my mate to **** off!!
Here's a scenario for you lot. We sell the main stay say Livermore, Snodgrass and a few others. We sign 5 loans and a couple of cheap foreigners. We get relegated.
When we go down what is there left? No manager, assert stripping chairmen who will sell anything of worth if we go down. No players?
Has snoddy ever said he wants away? I'm reading it that the club are playing hardball with him wanting a 3 year deal?Selling Livermore I totally agree with, selling Snodgrass I bloody don't. Although do we want players who don't want to be here??
Here's a scenario or you. We sell Livermore, we take the 10 mill, we make a few more additions, we stay up, Marco Silva signs a four year deal and we add to the squad again in the summer.
The Allams sell the club to a rich businessmen dying to invest greatly in a Premier League football club and look after the fans.
Lighten up![]()
He hasn't no but neither had Livermore. Just reading into the rumour circling that Snoddy wasn't at training today. Might be rubbishHas snoddy ever said he wants away? I'm reading it that the club are playing hardball with him wanting a 3 year deal?
By selling our best player?
Swansea are bottom of the league right now, flogging Sigurdsson would still be ****ing stupid.
Sunderland are below us, would selling Defoe be a wise move?
If your squad isn't good enough, I'd suggest selling your best player isn't a great way to go about it, especially if they've scored or created half of all your goals.
Also, I don't want to see Livermore leave, but I can understand that one a little more than letting Snodgrass leave. Will we be stronger because Livermore left? No, but if we replace him well we could be. I just don't see us replacing him with someone better. Some might call my cynical but I don't trust Ehab in the slightest.
Here's a scenario or you. We sell Livermore, we take the 10 mill, we make a few more additions, we stay up, Marco Silva signs a four year deal and we add to the squad again in the summer.
The Allams sell the club to a rich businessmen dying to invest greatly in a Premier League football club and look after the fans.
Lighten up![]()
Your not meant to read into It Literally , But Obvs Snodgrass Is the 2nd player he Is referencing.
Snodders wants a minimum 2 yr contract which he will not get with us, makes sense to cash in while his stock is high.
Livermore is a strange one, but if he wants to go, and we get a fair price then ok.
15-20 mil could really strengthenthe squad
What if that player didn't fit how your coach wanted you to play?
I'm 99% confident that we wont replace Jake.
I wouldn't contest it if I was you.![]()
It could also really really ****ing weaken it!Snodders wants a minimum 2 yr contract which he will not get with us, makes sense to cash in while his stock is high.
Livermore is a strange one, but if he wants to go, and we get a fair price then ok.
15-20 mil could really strengthenthe squad