Please read my earlier posts,101. There is a difference between the early troubles and those of the last two nights.
I know that there are deep rooted sociological and political issues that underpin all this that are both historical and current. Newspapers like The Guardian will try and look at those reasons and explain the bigger picture.
Sorry Sir John but that's just rubbish.
There are no deep rooted sociological issues, just a bunch of morons who are jumping on the bandwagon of easy theft and the chance to cause mayhem with little chance of being apprehended. The Guardian will try and excuse it by making up pseudo-babble.
Mostly good people live in these areas, all races, they aren't on the streets 'protesting', they are as appalled as the rest of us, yet they 'suffer' the same deprivations that you allude to.
I'm giving my opinion. I won't rubbish your opinion. I live in 'these areas' myself, have done so for all of my 38 years and I know that the majority of people are good people. Of course there are people involved in all this who have seen an opportunity to break the law, to wreak havoc on their own community and to seize an opportunity. But, when the time comes to analyse why this has happened there needs to be more than just a sweeping judgement made that focuses on the violence and a deeper analysis of what is actually going on in these areas. Oh,and I didn't allude to 'deprivations' at all.
As a sociology student I couldn't disagree with you more WSW, as you suggest they are bandwagon jumpers what about the issues that created that bandwagon and opportunity as well as the society that created them. People aren't just born criminals, they're made and moulded by the world around them.
As for not being born criminals, they are not "made and molded by the world around them", they are made and molded by the people around them.