He's on the bench for a reason mate. And it should have been a lot sooner than he was put there.
Match Day Thread Hull City v Man City
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
there's also no coincidence that after the boro game
he drops mason for huddlestone since the palace game and played the best we have
The difference between Mason and Henriksen is that on a couple of occasions the latter has shown a degree of promise which suggests that there is a player within screaming to be played in his best roll and then he'll prove all the doubters wrong. Mason has suggested nowt apart from the fact that he's a lightweight, weak clueless waste of most of our spending money. I've seen the sum total of **** all which suggests otherwise.
You must log in or register to see media
I don't know whether this has been put up already, but I couldn't be arsed to look back. Elmo at his worst.
One of those Tarzenesque lasso man-trap thingies wot are tied to trees obvs.
Hardly Elmo's fault. Do the groundstaff not check for these things pre-game?
A central midfielder who can't tackle is **** all use to us at the moment, so I'd rather he wasn't on the pitch.
That's not poodle behaviour, it's common sense.
Obviously those are disguised as the pop up spinklers that water the pitch. ****ing cunning idea. Should put some in the penalty area.
I wrote him off ages ago.
As lammy man will confirm.
But I am no expert and I am often wrong.
I agree he's not what we need in the team right now, Myler would do a better job.
However, he is a quality player, even if he is yet to show that for us, he has shown it in the past and the potential is clearly there.
I've seen him play some exceptional football, unfortunately it wasn't for Hull City.
I like the kid and hope he comes good but it's going to be a tough ask in a crap team.
Because I'm sad,I've crunched the numbers in the old NHL style of +/- for goals scored / conceded while players are on the pitch (no one has a positive number). The numbers are slightly skewed because I've not bothered with added time and Livermore and Elmo should be worse but for being sent off.
Player Mins per -1
Jak 450
Mal 148
Her 134
Hud 79
Tym 79
Mbo 75
Liv* 74
Elm* 73
Dio. 71
Daw 69
Rob 67
Sno 66
Clu. 65
Dav. 65 (played every minute)
Hen. 63
Bow. 60
Mey 54
Mar. 49
Mag. 46
Mas. 42
Kea. 35
I still hope he comes good, I've seen impressive performances from him for Spurs, so I'm aware he can play a bit, but he's been dire for us so far.
I just don't think it's problem to say so on here, it is what it is.
I don't think anyone ever said it is but the moaning, booing and jeering at the stadium is which is encouraged by the hysterical nappy filling drivel that is spouted on these sites.
Eh? That's obviously not what I said! The reasons lie in his inexperience in a relegation fight, as described in my second paragraph.
He clearly needed taking out of the firing line, and Phelan has tried to do that.
Those figures make a huge case for Jakapovic being in the team, and that's without anyone slating Marshall.
Jak will never be first choice GK as long as the idiot Phelan is in charge. Despite being by far the better keeper, (and in the top 5 in "save percentage" in the Prem), who inspires the team instead of letting in 3 goals a game, Phelan is determined to show that he didnt make a mistake by wasting almost 20 mill. on Marshall, Weir, Keane (who'll probably never play for City again) and above all the useless turd Mason, probably the worst player to pull on the black and amber in our Prem history. Meyler must be tearing his hair out that he's benched for this twat.