I can't stress enough that people don't realise this about them. Wherever possible they use their contacts and influence to put pressure on people who speak out against them. As you say, like the typical dictatorial regime.
John Hawley
- Thread starter City Man
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I can't stress enough that people don't realise this about them. Wherever possible they use their contacts and influence to put pressure on people who speak out against them. As you say, like the typical dictatorial regime.
They will trouser the £2,500 of course though.
In WW2 the Nazis executed 50 villagers as a reprisal , if one of theirs was killed by any local resistance.
In Putin's Russia, he imprisoned the music group Pussy Riot not so much to punish them, but to demonstrate to the any citizens of Russia the price to pay for 'rocking the boat.'
Squalid, bullying, spiteful weak ****ers.
They could have used this opportunity to prove the fans wrong.
We all expected him to be banned, it would have been easy to not ban him and say to the HDM or something "Look, we're not that bad. Everyone's got us wrong"
But no. No common sense. Proved what thin-skinned wimps they are. Again.
Why put themselves through it? Take the money on offer, enjoy it and leave the football to people who want to look after it.
We all expected him to be banned, it would have been easy to not ban him and say to the HDM or something "Look, we're not that bad. Everyone's got us wrong"
But no. No common sense. Proved what thin-skinned wimps they are. Again.
Why put themselves through it? Take the money on offer, enjoy it and leave the football to people who want to look after it.
Because then their on-pitch accomplishments could be overshadowed in the near future. Scorched earth it'll take years and they'll be smugly doing interviews saying how we should have backed them. Only problem for them is if someone snaps and does something they won't be around to act smug. You don't try and back a big group of people into a corner, because it only takes one to decide they've nothing to lose and you're in trouble.
This ban for John actually turns my stomach.
It is completely disgusting and disgraceful and really hard to believe.
I'm glad my mind doesn't work in the same way that theirs do.
Totally appalling.
It is completely disgusting and disgraceful and really hard to believe.
I'm glad my mind doesn't work in the same way that theirs do.
Totally appalling.
Let's hope there is a backlash against the Allams . John is a good lad supported the club when many couldn't be arsed . And in a position to do his own protest no one got hurt [HASHTAG]#ashamed[/HASHTAG] Allam out
Assam Allam went on BBC and said the labour leadership was a joke, so he can go on TV and criticise people, but people cannot criticise him. ****ing Hypocrite.
I hope the law firms that have offered Mr Oxley assistance really get the chance to take the club to the cleaners over this. When i say club, i really mean Escab the Horrible.
If Mr O has contravened "ground regulation 1.1.2", which says that in the club's reasonable opinion Mr Oxley's actions constituted "a source of danger, nuisance or annoyance to any other person" then does the same rule apply to the ****wit Family? Surely them just being in the same City can be classed a nuisance or annoyance to so many people. Can they get banned from the Stadium? Surely the infamous "Die when they want to" quote is far worse than any banner held up in the middle of the pitch.
It would be even funnier if the next sponsor also followed Mr Os lead and repeated his act or something very similar.
If Mr O has contravened "ground regulation 1.1.2", which says that in the club's reasonable opinion Mr Oxley's actions constituted "a source of danger, nuisance or annoyance to any other person" then does the same rule apply to the ****wit Family? Surely them just being in the same City can be classed a nuisance or annoyance to so many people. Can they get banned from the Stadium? Surely the infamous "Die when they want to" quote is far worse than any banner held up in the middle of the pitch.
It would be even funnier if the next sponsor also followed Mr Os lead and repeated his act or something very similar.
Ehab: "Hey Dad, I'm doing away with match sponsors in case anyone waves some fabric about on the pitch".
Assem: "Good idea my son, they are lousy and irrelevant, every club has sponsors, no club has none!"
Ehab: "Cool. I'll socialise my instructions immediately. Now, how do we get rid of the rest of the fans?"
Assem: "Good idea my son, they are lousy and irrelevant, every club has sponsors, no club has none!"
Ehab: "Cool. I'll socialise my instructions immediately. Now, how do we get rid of the rest of the fans?"
pudseytiger
Well-Known Member
Under the "ground regulation 1.1.2" the whole first team squad should have been banned from the stadium months ago, anyway on a serious note the way Mr Oxley's been treated by the toxic twins is appalling, what makes this even sadder is, I think the pair are enjoying it, loving the limelight .
This ban is covered by the HDM today. On their website the comments have obviously been doctored ( sic) because any comments agreeing with the ban has several, and in some cases thousands of 'thumbs up' ticks.
tigermaul
Well-Known Member
I see the SMC have sent out another letter to someone else who's contravened Ground Regulation 1.1.2 as their presence constitutes 'a source of danger, nuisance or annoyance to any other person'.
You must log in or register to see images
Or a thunderous chorus of 'John Oxley, he's one of our own' ?
Starting off with "One John Oxley" chants as the sponsors are in the middle then followed by applause until kick off ?
Lets bring back 19:04 chants loud n proud
Lets bring back 19:04 chants loud n proud
shame he didn't admit to this childish act when he was on RH yesterday crowing about the SMC and the ELO concert.Must be that James Deacon fella - MD of the SMC
Maybe he thought the banner could've incited a riot.
Probably someone that's able to multi tick like I can on my LG mobile.
Or some dick head Leeds Man U fan or bitter RL Fan