I agree that it doesn't improve the game and I'm not saying its right. In at least some of the countries where that attitude towards it exists, there have been attempts to stamp it out, as I understand it. Its not like its officially condoned by the footballing authorities but it seems to be considered that its worth the risk of being punished due to the benefits you get from it. Even the best referees will be taken in sometimes and retrospective punishments are unlikely to extend as far as changing the results of matches because of the anarchy that could lead to. So, as long as there is the slightest chance of gaining an advantage there will always be some players willing to risk the punishments.
I know you're not actually condoning it, just presenting a balanced viewpoint.
Tell you what though, if they did go so far as to deduct points for it then it'd be a very brave player that would continue to dive. It's like Full Metal Jacket, Private Pyle can take the personal insults and punishments to an extent but when the whole group gets punished for his mistakes is when it really hits home.
To me, clubs being hit with real sanctions for cheating players would force a dramatic shift from clubs passively encouraging diving to making damn sure that none of their players ever dives and I think we can all agree that would be better for the current and future state of our sport.
