Zuculini ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It would seem so mate, peregrin falcon has been quoted as saying so, not sure where he would fit in though???

Whats the point, some ****e flying about, about milner anarl, confused <confused>

On the bench and would do well if he got on. Worth it for free or a small loan fee.

Milner would be a great acquisition but it won't happen, been flying around for a couple of years, they need homegrown players.
 
On the bench and would do well if he got on. Worth it for free or a small loan fee.

Milner would be a great acquisition but it won't happen, been flying around for a couple of years, they need homegrown players.

But why would gus put our players noses out to bring a loan in thats gonna pee off when franks loan is up? Woukd piss me off like?
 
But why would gus put our players noses out to bring a loan in thats gonna pee off when franks loan is up? Woukd piss me off like?

We're going to get people in on loan as squad players. Otherwise our squad just isn't big enough.

None of the players (Giack especially) cried when Borini was doing well last year. If the players can't handle competition for places they can go the way N'Diaye did. His career is going from strength to strength.
 
We're going to get people in on loan as squad players. Otherwise our squad just isn't big enough.

None of the players (Giack especially) cried when Borini was doing well last year. If the players can't handle competition for places they can go the way N'Diaye did. His career is going from strength to strength.

I take that point, giacc is confirmed as being fooked for the start of the season, what i am saying is, why bring somebody in ahead of what we've already got?

Just answered the question in my own heed, keeps relationships with city strong and also gives the young-uns the opportunity to learn - which then poses the question, why let ba go out?

Still confused
 
I take that point, giacc is confirmed as being fooked for the start of the season, what i am saying is, why bring somebody in ahead of what we've already got?

Just answered the question in my own heed, keeps relationships with city strong and also gives the young-uns the opportunity to learn - which then poses the question, why let ba go out?

Still confused

Ba hasn't played first team football regularly at all in his career, Zuculini has in Spain, I imagine that is a large reason. Ba needs first team football, which he won't get here, he'll benefit a lot more playing week in week out, as appose to sitting on our bench.

Zuculini will also be better then Ba.

Also, I very much doubt Zuculini will be coming in as a starter, I suspect Larsson and Rodwell will be our cm's vs WBA.
 
I take that point, giacc is confirmed as being fooked for the start of the season, what i am saying is, why bring somebody in ahead of what we've already got?

Just answered the question in my own heed, keeps relationships with city strong and also gives the young-uns the opportunity to learn - which then poses the question, why let ba go out?

Still confused

Ba clearly isn't up to it just yet.

I haven't read anywhere that this lad would be coming in ahead of Larsson, Rodwell, Catts or Gomez. Poyet, if interested at all, clearly feels he offers something different and can provide depth.

We brought Borini in on loan last year for the exact same reason, Vergini too. Until we can afford to pay for and own 23/24/25 players that Gus is happy with we need to fill out the squad with loan players.
 
Squad is thin, we were always going to have to use Loans to add depth. I'd rather we brought in a next level cb and borini(or his alternative) than wasting our budget spending money on bench warmers. If he's as good as we're led to believe then he'll bring plenty for little cost.
 
Ba hasn't played first team football regularly at all in his career, Zuculini has in Spain, I imagine that is a large reason. Ba needs first team football, which he won't get here, he'll benefit a lot more playing week in week out, as appose to sitting on our bench.

Zuculini will also be better then Ba.

Also, I very much doubt Zuculini will be coming in as a starter, I suspect Larsson and Rodwell will be our cm's vs WBA.

Ba clearly isn't up to it just yet.

I haven't read anywhere that this lad would be coming in ahead of Larsson, Rodwell, Catts or Gomez. Poyet, if interested at all, clearly feels he offers something different and can provide depth.

We brought Borini in on loan last year for the exact same reason, Vergini too. Until we can afford to pay for and own 23/24/25 players that Gus is happy with we need to fill out the squad with loan players.

Brudcutt has the minerals anarl for me

Squad is thin, we were always going to have to use Loans to add depth. I'd rather we brought in a next level cb and borini(or his alternative) than wasting our budget spending money on bench warmers.

Evening byram
 
Forgot about him, hope you're right. He should be competing with Catts for his place, I presume this lad plays in a more advanced role.

This is what i dont get, gotta be more in it than this, favours i'm thinking

Give him game time, we'll give you milner in jan

Or guidetti if connor hasnt sorted his **** out!

I'll say one thing that dc united deal pipps all other clubs like

Safc in the driving seat

That is ****ing beyond my comprehension
 
Nicolás Montalá @NicoMontala · 19m
El padre de Bruno Zuculini me confirma que su hijo se irá cinco meses a préstamo al Sunderland. El domingo, con el City, debuta vs. Arsenal

Hans Kristian Lange @mulu83 · 17m
Bruno Zuculini's father confirms his son will play vs Arsenal on Sunday, then leave for 5 months at Sunderland (@NicoMontala)