To be fair, Barca was about the only club on earth Fabregas could struggle at given Xavi was nailed on to play the role Fabregas was best at. Fabregas was then playing other roles such as wide and false 9 which didn't suit him as well. Despite this, his time in Spain was still successful and he played loads of games. Put him in his best position and you see what he can do as proven by his time at Arsenal and now with us. An absolute undeniable top class talent. Ibrahimovic was also a Barca 'reject' and has since proven himself to be one of the best players on the planet. Same with Robben and Sneijder with Real.
Since carricks return weve lost 0, conceded 4 and won 6 out of 7. That is why i picked him. I suggest you mard arse gimps quit crying over it. Its a bit sad really. I also missed off a few players who could have been included by others. Costa, austin, di maria, chelsea dave, fonte, zabaleta, forster etc. Nobody is having a tantrum over that. You obviously need people to tell you how good you are. Well you're ****, boring and have no future
Who doesnt? You seem incapable of recognising that an attacking midfielder and number 10 are the same thing. For whatever reason...
You are the one confusing Fabregas for a number 10, nobody else. His position at Chelsea is beside Matic in the Pivot and he has absolutely smashed it so far.
You could make that argument on the teams they play for, although Aguero has been more consistent and better than Costa, scored more goals, and has carried a weaker City team to within touching distance of Chelsea. If you're picking a team with two strikers, it'd be Aguero and Austin for me.
I had to check and as i suspected. No mention ofbfabregas being a number ten or that rooney and fabregas play in the same position. What i said was rooney is in fabs position. And had i selected fabregas i would have dropped hazard for di maria and gone 433. This is because fabregas is suspect defensively. He is noy a defensive midfielder and you have to question the knowledge of anyone who thinks that by playing for thr worlds most defensive side makes him good at it. Matic is your protection. The midfielder who makes everything else work. Its a bit like Alonso and Gerrard. One does all work while the other takes all the praise but, when it really matters, the one claiming all the glory, well hes MIA. My team doesn't carry passengers. ive included two of the most important players for two of the top 3 clubs in the division. Not sure what the issue is. Give me a shout when you've both stopped having yoyr periods you pait of ****ing girls. but fabregas has made some assists . Best midfielder in the best team yada yada bullshit my period hurts, hold me fabregas Grip. Invest in one
Prepare for tears. These two are incredibly insecure about their side. Dont worry lads, you're amazing. So chelsea!!!
Oh and you guys play fab deeper because the alternative is jon obi mikel. So fab deeper and oscar forward is better than fab forward and obi mikel alongside matic. Matic is good, but nobody can carry obi mikel. Nobody.
A quick comparison shows exactly why you dont pick cesc for his defensive work. An interesting one is how often a player is dribbled past (or beaten by an opponent) Cesc is beaten almost 3 times a game. Carrick, once every two games. Interceptions are also interesting. Carrick making 1.5 to cescs 0.6. Carrick also makes few tackles than cesc which in turn results in less fouls. What i am saying is of you think cesc ****s on carrick? You have literally no idea about football. You clearly look at the assist and goal column and base everything off that. Fair play to you for being simple. Someones got to be. Oh and passing. Carrick wins that as well. Oh and blocks, clearances. Basically every single part about being a defensive midfielder carrick is superior at. Now attacking. Cesc is miles ahead. Carrick doesnt even come into question.
Schneiderlin was the other option to carrick. Another great dm. A bit of bias towards carrick swung it. Careful though. Putting cesc in his best position might cause some to break down.
