You'd need to have a heart of stone not to laugh

I clicked on the link to see how old the kid was. Didn't read anything else

 

Waiting for the NRA to say it would never have happened if there'd been a bunch of other 4 year olds carrying who could have stopped the evil one with clear mental issues....

 

She needs jailtime for endangering the kid

 

yes. if she'd been shot i nthe liver she could have bled out and crashed and killed the child.

he could have shot himself just as easy.

it i a perfect example of karma.

 

Whereas if he'd shot her in the head and killed her instantly she'd have been able to stop the car in a sensible manner

 

you didn't read it.

she was shot in the back according to the story. just as easy to hit her in the liver or kidney etc.

You just wanted him to hit her in the head.

I would contend she'd not even have noticed and continued on her was she's that dim.

 

Just thought it was funny that you picked a resulting injury that WOULD have allowed her to stop the car normal (albeit painfully) rather than a injury where she'd have no control over it

You could have said shot her spine paralyzing her. She wouldn't have been able to stop the car then!

 

have you ever been shot in the liver?

just so you know. stopping a car normally is just a tad more difficult than that.

no fine lets shoot her in the spine next and see... i'd advise several experiments to see which she'd crash in.

 

I did say "albeit painfully". In other words, she would still be alive and, if she had the will power to do so, she could stop the car. As I said, I just found it amusing that you choose a injury that wouldn't 100% result in a crash; aka your point

 

You've no been shot in the liver then... or anywhere else.

 

Undoubtedly.
She obviously has no ****ing brains to blow out.

 

Apology accepted

 

You lot will argue over anything.

Back to the OP. This doesn't make me laugh at all, tbh.
It makes me bloody angry that so many brainless cretins are allowed to walk the streets- never mind own guns.
I don't mind them being a danger to themselves- that's Darwinism in action- but the danger they pose to other, normal people is wholly unacceptable.

 

Mweh...statistically Darwinism is still working.

Most legal gun carrying rednecks are more likely to kill themselves or their families and most illegal guns are more likely to kill other scumbags with illegal guns.

Slowly but surely cleaning out the gene pool.

 

I bet there's quite a few families of genuinely innocent victims that would dispute that.

 

As long as they keep that ****e in their own country and not bring another american idiology over here, couldn't give a ****.

Just feel sorry for the minority of sensible Americans they have there.

 

I was being pedantic

 

I know there are and they have my genuine sympathy as individuals.

Except most of their country men have a borderline psychopathic affection for a misinterpretation of the 2nd amendment. We can't help them. I mean if the prospect that more citizens die by gunfire on US soil than their troops in wars doesn't convince them nothing will.

My sympathy stops in general when they do nothing about it or actively resist making their country safer.

There is no solution for them.

 

evidently....

I'm going to shoot you in the liver later and see if you pass out of continue as normal.

Don't flinch please... it'll ruin the experiment.

 

Also, our own species has had a couple of million years of Darwinism at least, so if it really did weed out stupidity we'd all be geniuses by now, and not just me and Sis.
Genetic Variability just keeps making more of the dim ****ers.