1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Yesterday's game

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by rangercol, Mar 4, 2012.

  1. KooPeeArr

    KooPeeArr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,903
    Likes Received:
    2,260
    Maybe you're right.

    If it was me, I'd change the system long enough to make it look like the move to 4231 was my tactical master stroke and not something I inherited.

    Perhaps its my ego that's the problem then.... ;)
     
    #81
  2. QPR Oslo

    QPR Oslo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    21,703
    Likes Received:
    6,776
    It started to go wrong against Wolves before the sending off as I recall, Wolves started pulling our defense into disarray from when they were forced to make a substitution, and brought on another striker for a MF player. Your team looks much too weak defensively to me, I'd go:

    ----------------------Cerny-----------------
    Onouha------Fedinand-------Hill---------Traore
    ---------------Barton---Derry----------------
    ----------Cisse-------Buz---------------Adel
    ----------------------Zamora---------------

    And Zamora will not be alone up front, as Cisse in particular would be getting into the box with him. All the front 4 need to interchange in attack, and everyone except perhaps 1 man, behind the ball when we lose it. I'd start with Derry to be on the safe side and bring on Diakite when his legs start to tire.
     
    #82
  3. Chair Nob'll Fallout

    Chair Nob'll Fallout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    222
    #83
  4. Sooperhoop

    Sooperhoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    35,569
    Likes Received:
    27,978
    What do the Guardian know about football?...:grin:
     
    #84
  5. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    Nuts....I think you'll find that was exactly what I was saying!
     
    #85

Share This Page