Antagonistic because you question is a negative one, which is in keeping with your usual comments about Leicester City.
I suggest you do an 'advanced search' and look through the posts of Leeds-18 on this board if you think my default mode is anti-Leicester.
But as you practically admit, it's pretty feeble WUMing.
Wrong. I never said it was a wind-up at all and maintain that it isn't. Just a thought that occurred to me when Google linked me to your site earlier (was searching for 'Leeds United' and it brought up the Beckford article). Was a bit shocked to discover that the site still has this generic format which every club seems to use.
What kind of person criticises the website of a football club they don't support and then goes to the trouble of going onto that team's fan forum to tell them so?!
Umm, me I guess. If that makes me some kind of sad act then so be it. I use this forum to share thoughts which you might consider trifling, and I plan to continue doing so.
And as you practically admit, this is a virtually pointless thread since nobody cares what you think about our website, as it is isn't aimed at you and is not really reflective of our club anyway. So there.
Nobody cares about what I think? Why have people replied then? Dyer, Proud, Ed, Stourbridge, Emilio and NZ all discussing the topic I intended to be discussed. So maybe you should take your apathy up with them too. Give up on the paranoia, eh? The big bad Leeds fan isn't out to get you, just to discuss something I found a tad odd. I'm glad to see it's being debated in good spirits with the exception of two or three ad hominem merchants.

