Wum skunks

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Roger is like that one mate everyone has (we all have at least one) that cant take any banter and just kicks off and takes it to heart, lighten up mate, life goes on, you suffered a heavy loss this weekend and we enjoyed a heavy win, the complete opposite could happen next weekend and I certainly wouldnt be calling for people to be deleted.

Just have a laugh with it man grandad <ok>


See what I mean Roger reasonably sensible comment, then he goes and spoils it by claiming he has more than one mate :p
 
To be fair Syd, Roger has a point, Wumming was only to be epxected but there were a few arseholes who just put ****ing stupid dancing clowns on every thread, no comments or debate or even wumming just ridiculous dancing clowns. I've just deleted some by the resident ****** known as the Troll and i will delete everyone he posts on here. If he wants to wind us up or have a good argument then fair enough, i'm up for that but posting ****ing dancing clown just sums up the blokes mentality. He should be banned off here anyway. (again)

I agree but when we have a day like Sunday we expect to get stick and IMHO the vast majority of mags who came on gave gentle stick and good debate but we will always get the numpties. I dont see how we say you come over but not you so just ignore the idiots who just came over for the day. The other two are not in that group, neither debates and both are regular wumers who never go on the Newcastle board so to me serve no purpose.
 
Roger is like that one mate everyone has (we all have at least one) that cant take any banter and just kicks off and takes it to heart, lighten up mate, life goes on, you suffered a heavy loss this weekend and we enjoyed a heavy win, the complete opposite could happen next weekend and I certainly wouldnt be calling for people to be deleted.

Just have a laugh with it man grandad <ok>

You have misunderstood my message, if you read my article fully, you will realise that you were one of the people i referred to, i expected you to come in all guns blazing, but you were sincere, thoughtful and debated well.

I do not want to ban a debate i want the option to get rid of the stupid cartooners with no debate and who want to rile, after all its our board.
 
If you look at the percentage of Skunks who post on our board compared to Sunderland fans on theirs, and I'm not just talking after our heavy defeat, leads me to believe that the only logical conclusion is that the Skunks are far more obsessed with us as we are with them.
 
this thread is WUM SKUNKS.........
instead of going on about, banning and deleting, and bickering utter ****, get to the point of the thread lads,
let it all out, cos its going stale,

at least sol is ours, not a council land owned prison look-a-like ****hole,
your manager only got the job cos he got fat mikes missus up the duff, or maybe it was redknapp as they were both there, while fat boy was upstairs buying more thfc shares.
 
this thread is WUM SKUNKS.........
instead of going on about, banning and deleting, and bickering utter ****, get to the point of the thread lads,
let it all out, cos its going stale,

at least sol is ours, not a council land owned prison look-a-like ****hole,
your manager only got the job cos he got fat mikes missus up the duff, or maybe it was redknapp as they were both there, while fat boy was upstairs buying more thfc shares.

How is it that you get all the gossip from hundreds of miles away and I hear nowt.
 


I came to the board after the match, only to find that we were inundated, with skunks crawling out from the woodwork, with their stupid cartoons, and spoiling every thread, so i decided to leave it until now to respond.

Sit at home and watch telly instead? What did you watch? Hawaii 5-0?
 
How is it that you get all the gossip from hundreds of miles away and I hear nowt.

well you know what a big mouth redkapps got, he's hoping its a boy, and if it is he's got a free players, but if its pardews he's already offered 20 million with add on's
 
If you look at the percentage of Skunks who post on our board compared to Sunderland fans on theirs, and I'm not just talking after our heavy defeat, leads me to believe that the only logical conclusion is that the Skunks are far more obsessed with us as we are with them.


Think the logical conclusion is Newcastle is a far bigger and better supported club then scumderland

Newcastle United
Threads: 3,209
Posts: 65,220


Sunderland
Threads: 1,812
Posts: 26,039


Reckon 50% of muckems post are from 10 posters , oldsid has beaten half the premiership teams on this board
 
What about lining up all the skunks and shooting them all (except the little yella fellas with the black suits and dark glasses)?


Alternatively we could let our moderators sort it :police:


Personally I still have the hump with our lads and not too bothered with Badgers Army.
 
Think the logical conclusion is Newcastle is a far bigger and better supported club then scumderland

Newcastle United
Threads: 3,209
Posts: 65,220


Sunderland
Threads: 1,812
Posts: 26,039
was just thinking how many the mags would have if you actually posted on there
 
Sorry Roger but this time I dont agree, infact I started a thread to invite them over. If the weekend had been the other way round, we had won and gone above Newcastle and they had lost 5-0 would we have enjoyed the moment,I would. If we give it we have to take it and TBH I enjoyed the banter.

There are only a couple of so called Newcastle fans I detest, think everyone knows who they are, neither visits the mags board.

This <ok> Well said , Syd.

Get over it Roger and stop being a big baby. I would bet my life you would have done exactly the same thing if it was the other way around. Hypocrite.
 
Think the logical conclusion is Newcastle is a far bigger and better supported club then scumderland

Newcastle United
Threads: 3,209
Posts: 65,220


Sunderland
Threads: 1,812
Posts: 26,039


Reckon 50% of muckems post are from 10 posters , oldsid has beaten half the premiership teams on this board

And may I ask you why you are never on our board? Don't take this as an invite , just wondering...
 
Think the logical conclusion is Newcastle is a far bigger and better supported club then scumderland

Newcastle United
Threads: 3,209
Posts: 65,220


Sunderland
Threads: 1,812
Posts: 26,039

I'm sorry but I disagree. If you ever actually go and look at the Newcastle board, you would discover that 95% of the posts are utter, utter drivel. This may be another contributing factor as why so many Skunks spend so much time over here.
 
was just thinking how many the mags would have if you actually posted on there

just trying to get your post count up, dont you get tired of being 2nd best at everything, 90% of posts on muckems board that gets more then 100 replies is about Newcastle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.