World war 3
- Thread starter OLOF
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
There's a few chimpanzees on here DavyI'm a feckin' elephant, me.
Funny you should mention her. She's been hyped for many years, but it turns out that, according to some, she was an evil bitch who wouldn't administer pain relief, as the pain the dying suffered brought them closer to God, or some nonsense like that. I only heard about this recently, and appears to check out. It's amazing the crap the media feeds us unchallenged.I look out for the bullshit and they invariably trip themselves up eventually, even if it takes a few years, as Glory has just done
Bit like Corbyn claiming he's the new Mother Teresa
Once again you only wrote what you want to convince the masses of.
I'm sure most have watched the video, and drawn their own conclusions, however,
You claim the man getting a pasting was defenceless.......wrong......neither person had a weapon of any kind.
You also claimed Tommy's mates held the other guy down while Tommy hit him........monotonously, wrong again. Two guys jumped in to break up the fight, one even pushed Tommy away.
Meaning of obstreperous
adjective
1.resisting control or restraint in a difficult manner; unruly.
2.noisy, clamorous, or boisterous:
You make out the other guy did nothing wrong, but you mentioned he was being Obstreperous.........which one is it?
You claim I and others are racist, having equal rights to you in being able to voice our opinions of course, you even claimed the British National Anthem was racist, then you have a go at Mother Teresa.
Remember, you put the original link up....
Can someone mention Noddy and Big ears, his reply would be a cracker......but please don't mention Baa Baa Black Sheep.
I found the thread fair play chippy you are not guilty as charged
apparently you were taking a piss with the OB throwing bricks at you
Thankyou...
And you thought no one likes millwallI found the thread fair play chippy you are not guilty as charged
apparently you were taking a piss with the OB throwing bricks at you
OB don't throw bricks at you lads. his mum used to tie a bone around his neck,so the dog would play with him.
heres the guy from newsnight last night.
http://www.westmonster.com/23000-british-jihadists-just-tip-of-the-iceberg1/
http://www.westmonster.com/23000-british-jihadists-just-tip-of-the-iceberg1/
Don't start them off Wakey
were having a hug a Jihadist day today,just check they don't have explosive belts on first.
Hang on a minute. You can't lay that one on me. I'm simply stating a fact. You're the one that makes stuff up,presumably just for the thrill of confrontation.
And you thought no one likes millwall
they wouldn't fooking dare me old mukka
Chesh makes a fair comment you are just a bully
just kidding you are not just a bully you are a fat bully
Here we go again. More rancid pish from you.
When you are unable to defend yourself, you are defenceless. It's a recognised FACT. The guy was CLEARLY not able to defend himself - watch his uncoordinated movements. And the 2 guys DID hold on to him whilst Tommy Mosley rained 5 blows down on him. Mosley being pushed aside happened too, but he still rained in those 5 blows whilst those 2 guys held the other guy down. Yo cannot deflect from that. Are you sure you watched the video? I did direct you to the clip from 51s to 56s. Are you telling me now it didn't happen? If so, you are truly deluding yourself.
Weapon? This was mentioned once, only as an aside as it's a legal reality that Mosley leaves himself wide open to by having something in his hand whilst beating the other guy. You clearly didn't notice it. Nothing is considered irrelevant in this technical legal consideration. Get into a fight with anything in your hand, and the stakes become higher. I have no idea why you choose to mention this.
Obstreperous. I'm perfectly familiar with the word & don't need a definition. I used it after all, & normally am aware of the meaning of the words I use. Clearly you didn't & had to look it up. But you insult the intelligence of everyone on here by assuming that you have to publish it to educate them. THEN you go and tell a bald lie. I did not call the guy obstreperous! I used the word once, and it was a specific example addressed to Chesh. So not only was it nowt to do with you, you made assumptions, tried to put words into my mouth, and ballsed it up completely. Again. And another lie was that I said the other guy did nothing wrong. At no time did I ever say that, so don't lie. I simply and correctly stated there was no evidence of how it started, or who struck the first blow. Why must you lie to try to win a debate? Do you not realised it's all still up here & easily checked? Are you that thick?
I did call you racist. It's true. End of. Others? I honestly cannot recall if I directed that term at anyone else, but if I used such a term, it was seriously considered before using it.
The British National Anthem is racist, and has been recognised widely as such, to the extent that verse 6 is no longer printed in hymn books, for instance, and of course the whole anthem has been completely rejected by most official bodies in Scotland - mainly for it's content & contempt. If you think otherwise, you are in a very small minority, and clearly have problems with your interpretation skills. Your comment suggests that either you have not came into contact with verse 6, or are more incredibly stupid than I ever thought was possible.
Mother Teresa? Having a go? At a witch that took pleasure in watching the dying in incredible pain? A religious zealot who baptised all dying patients of every religion even when they expressly stated they did not want it to happen? A harridan who shunned the most basic medical principles by not carrying out an initial triage to separate those who were terminal from those who could be saved, leaving them all together to share infections etc. There are documentaries & books that cover the subject in much detail. How can you defend her when you know nothing about her? Are you just trying to score some sort of moral point in mentioning her name, as though she should be absolved from all crimes just because of her name? Go do some research before you bump your gums. I do not anticipate a sensible response other than an apology, as you can't argue against facts - especially ones you're not even in possession of. And just as an aside, her shrine is located in her birthplace - here in Skopje, capital of Macedonia. Very interesting building that's had a lot of money spent on it.
Why are you telling me I put the link up? I'm fully aware. You might be in the habit of disowning things you post, but I'm not and don't need a reminder. Why would you do that?
As for the final line in your post, I think you should call nurse & double up on your meds. You appear to have lost it completely - and have provided fine evidence.
I hope that gobby **** who abused Tommy Robinson and his family has learnt a lesson from the well deserved slapping he got,
don't mouth off if you can't back it up
don't mouth off if you can't back it up
He started it again this morning,I could have responded with he had got every fact wrong again but I didn't I asked him to let it go as its destroying the site,but he didn't/can't.I said yesterday one of you,wj or 20/20 would kick it off again,and sadly I was right.
Do you realise how pathetic you sound? Are you five years old.mmmwwwwaaaaahhhhhhh!
You still aint apologised for your lying about me yesterday.......
No I'm not. You're trying to lay 'destroying the site' at my doorstep. I've simply informed you that I was stating a fact. Why should you be allowed to stop by having a snipe at me & I'm not allowed to reply?Can't let it go can youthe only one trying to get it going again is you.
- Status