World war 3

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hahaha, how naive. Do you really think the tory-controlled media would run with this?

How about one of the most respective journalists in the land? There are other articles too, if you want to do the minimum of legwork, but I don't ever see that happening!

http://johnpilger.com/articles/terror-in-britain-what-did-the-prime-minister-know

Remember, I simply present what I find from reputable sources.

You're the one that lies, not me! So no deletion.
Talk about Naive,I posted that story 2weeks ago <doh> he probably copied it off Me <laugh> Tony Blair or John Major allowed the bombers dad a terrorist into the country because he had been fighting against Gadaffi,the dad and his kids have since been back fighting there.Nothing to do with May,Blair or Major the guilty party.A fake news story trying to get a pay day.
 
WC, with respects,

I find it hard to understand how you can say "more anger will not help". Anger is a naturally expressed emotional feeling felt by the people and families of the dead, maimed and injured, not only in this country, but most countries around the world which was brought about by terrorist acts in the name of Allah, Allah being the Muslim God. You can throw in the rapes and beatings of women, as well as the sexual rapes and abuse of kids, kids as young as 5yrs old......why shouldn't we be angry.

The people of most countries around the world have a right to feel and express their anger at what is going on around them, and around the world by a people who follow the outdated Quran and the medieval and outdated teachings of their Mohammed. These people want to annihilate every other religion and faith from the face of the earth, they want to rape and sexually abuse young women and children, they want to make it law to rape females and children of the western world....who wouldn't be angry.

I also fail to see the comparison between our anger and the way the muslims feel towards the western world, and our anger is certainly not mirroring the way the terrorists feel, they feel hatred and resentment for anything and anyone not Muslim; I doubt very much they're feeling angry when they bomb and kill people, women and children around the world, I very much doubt they're feeling angry when they rape women, and sexually rape very young children.

I suspect the point you were trying to make was not as it was written....:emoticon-0148-yes:
Anyone who starts 'with respect' is generally not going to be respectful. And you help prove the assertion.

What you're saying is that the qu'ran is outdated & should be ignored. I tend to agree. But by omission, you're saying that the bible, several thousand years older in parts, is ok. <doh> Guess you've never read the Bible then?

Also, you are saying that the sexual crimes they commit is abhorrent. I quite agree. But, again by omission, you're saying that institutional child abuse & *****philia in the Catholic Church is ok. <doh>

Or are you just attacking the Muslim religion because you think you can ingratiate yourself by picking up on the flavour of a few racist post on here? I tend to agree. You always seem to unnecessarily specify Muslims where many do not.
 
Tar" ALL" terrorists with the same brush<laugh> are you for real, are there some decent terrorists then?

You loony lefties would be the first to moan if refugees were "allocated" to live in your area, but they aren't are they, because you toffee nosed lefties won't allow it. hypocrite
Point of order!

You really need to read up on the SRA. They were perfectly decent & even though they used explosives, they achieved their objective, with no loss of life or injuries. Troo dat!
 
I wonder if David Lloyd George and Winston Churchill were angry, or they just fancied a punch up
Not sure if you're aware, but this pair sent British troops in against striking miners in Wales & Scotland - tanks, howitzers, the lot. And fired on the miners. And killed them too. Makes Maggie Thatcher look like an angel.
 
Point of order!

You really need to read up on the SRA. They were perfectly decent & even though they used explosives, they achieved their objective, with no loss of life or injuries. Troo dat!

doesn't make them "GOOD" Terrorists where did they use these explosives in the middle of the desert or the ocean ? they are terrorists end of bang em up wipe them out no different to the rest of the scumbags <ok>
 
Talk about Naive,I posted that story 2weeks ago <doh> he probably copied it off Me <laugh> Tony Blair or John Major allowed the bombers dad a terrorist into the country because he had been fighting against Gadaffi,the dad and his kids have since been back fighting there.Nothing to do with May,Blair or Major the guilty party.A fake news story trying to get a pay day.
FFS! Read the item, not the headline!

Read from the 'smoking gun' paragraph onwards. That's the story - what Mayhem allowed & what she knew & didn't act on. Good old FBI leaked very incriminating evidence against her.

Now if you say you have read it, I despair. I didn't realise the brainwashing had gone that far. <doh>
 
doesn't make them "GOOD" Terrorists where did they use these explosives in the middle of the desert or the ocean ? they are terrorists end of bang em up wipe them out no different to the rest of the scumbags <ok>
You need to read up on them. They were good. Bloody good. They won. No dead. No injured. Objective achieved. Government gave in & acted correctly.

You'll actually be amused if you read it. As far as I'm aware, not other 'terrorist group' has won 100% with the British government. And probably never will.

The term 'terrorist' was applied to them by the government, but if you read it up, perhaps you can tell me where the terror element was. :D
 
You need to read up on them. They were good. Bloody good. They won. No dead. No injured. Objective achieved. Government gave in & acted correctly.

You'll actually be amused if you read it. As far as I'm aware, not other 'terrorist group' has won 100% with the British government. And probably never will.

The term 'terrorist' was applied to them by the government, but if you read it up, perhaps you can tell me where the terror element was. :D

I will give you one example off the top of my head
Was it not your lot who poisoned vodka only to be stopped before they killed people who drank it ?

might be wrong but am I ?
 
FFS! Read the item, not the headline!

Read from the 'smoking gun' paragraph onwards. That's the story - what Mayhem allowed & what she knew & didn't act on. Good old FBI leaked very incriminating evidence against her.

Now if you say you have read it, I despair. I didn't realise the brainwashing had gone that far. <doh>
What planet have you lived on the last 20 years ? Its our,Europes and the Americans official policy to support the anti ISIS terrorist groups,we all think there are good terrorists and bad one's when in fact the only good one is a dead one.The only country with the right policy is Russia with a kill the lot policy.Its no news and nothing new,which is why only you are getting excited about it.<doh>
 
What planet have you lived on the last 20 years ? Its our,Europes and the Americans official policy to support the anti ISIS terrorist groups,we all think there are good terrorists and bad one's when in fact the only good one is a dead one.The only country with the right policy is Russia with a kill the lot policy.Its no news and nothing new,which is why only you are getting excited about it.<doh>
So you still haven't read the article. No need to broadcast it. Assumed there were too many home truths in it for you. <doh> [HASHTAG]#sopredictable[/HASHTAG]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.