The assumption was that you made up an answer that I didn't say or think.Your mind goes off to fairy land,and you think you talk fact when in fact its crap.you then start abuse but start crying when you get some back.If you can't take it back don't give it out
FFS, I'll say it one last time. Yes, I did say mouth. It's a specialised shot. No doubt it was part of the 'head shot' training that the police were given by the SAS, and it's specialised nature detailed. Why you avoid the bare facts & insist in giving a rudimentary anatomy lesson, I have no idea. Perhaps to just can't bear to be wrong & chosse to obfuscate with nonsense.
You think? Based on what? Some silly notion in your head? A blind belief that the tories are good for you? Why not check it out before humiliating yourself. Again.
I talk fact by giving sources where I can. You talk crap by making things up in your head. Try giving sources to counter my sources. That's how debate works. Not making things up & expecting people to believe you. Think your name's May? I'd rather have James May as PM than either of you.The assumption was that you made up an answer that I didn't say or think.Your mind goes off to fairy land,and you think you talk fact when in fact its crap.you then start abuse but start crying when you get some back.If you can't take it back don't give it out
You're right,but only one of us thinks the other doesn't have a right of reply.As long as he keeps talking tosh I will keep correcting him.
No you give sources that have nothing or very little to do with what you are saying,not seen 1 correct fact or source from you that proves anything yet,although you seem to believe it does
As you will find out by Friday,the vast majority will not vote for your terrorist supporting friend.Clever people can see right through him and the rubbish he spouts although I can see you can't.
I could have written the same about you! And you most certainly ARE talking tosh.
Well perhaps you should read them. I've given many, many sources & you've never rebutted any of them them with evidence. Not once. Misguided opinion, yes, but evidence-based rebuttal, no. Do you even know how to provide a link?No you give sources that have nothing or very little to do with what you are saying,not seen 1 correct fact or source from you that proves anything yet,although you seem to believe it does
There you go again! I have stated clearly on here - more than once - that I do not like the idea of Corbyn as PM. However I have qualified this by saying that he'd make a better fist of it than Mayhem. So why tell lies? Why? And why this nonsense about me being his friend? Where did that come from? Chesh's fcukedupbrainworld?
As all your links have very little or no relevance imo to any of the debates,there is no need to rebut them, we can all see they are wrong to start with.
Your a tender one Jock,if I was you I would go on about the lies your telling about me reading the sun and daily mail,but will just say I never buy Newspapers and rarely read any of them.As normal you got it all wrong,so again there is no reason to post any link to you being wrong again.
Hahaha! You just don't understand debate, do you? You have to give reasoned arguments to rebut, not whimsical notions. Hahaha!
Like I said if your whole point is obviously wrong to all who see it,and most of yours are,there's no need to put a link as people can see you're clearly wrong without me pointing it out,even though you can't.
