fooking quote bollox does me every fooking timeGood point Mighty,we will be debating that one for hours.

fooking quote bollox does me every fooking timeGood point Mighty,we will be debating that one for hours.

Mate, if I am alive at 99 I will probably long since have lost the marbles to know what you are on about. In the meantime, I shall cherish Mightygate as the all time classic that it is / wasAlas, unlike Mightygate, it is not a timeless classic
I'm sure in about 50 years give or take a few we might start to find it a tad tedious
49 & 50 = 99. However, considering the battering I have given my body in the first 49 years I think there is more chance of the Wall doing a Leicester than me making 99!99
thought that was an ice cream
49 & 50 = 99. However, considering the battering I have given my body in the first 49 years I think there is more chance of the Wall doing a Leicester than me making 99!

But I meant winning the PL not playing in League One again!hang in there mukka only another 2 years
breath in breath out
Nah mate, it's like talking to Chippy on her, one slip of the tongue and you in the ****Prefer a 69![]()
at my age mukka I will take the ice cream![]()





that made me spit my ale out.....ffs I hate waste
Nah mate, it's like talking to Chippy on her, one slip of the tongue and you in the ****
that made me spit my ale out.....ffs I hate waste
![]()

And what if they were dirty bombs? There's a lot to consider in these circumstances. Sounds to me that the police were reckless. 50 bullets! Didn't someone say that there were fewer rounds fired when the SAS successfully attacked the Iranian Embassy?Yes but I would say the police were far away,I meant they can't risk letting them set bombs off near people.
Now you're being weirdif the ice cream is pistachio and walnut it will smell and taste the same![]()

Another thing - it's not just about the police being far away - what about civilians? There was at least one close enough to get shot by the police, it appears!Yes but I would say the police were far away,I meant they can't risk letting them set bombs off near people.
If they had dirty bombs,they would have let them off when they were far away.And what if they were dirty bombs? There's a lot to consider in these circumstances. Sounds to me that the police were reckless. 50 bullets! Didn't someone say that there were fewer rounds fired when the SAS successfully attacked the Iranian Embassy?
So what would you have preferred letting them kill a few more,then ask for a meeting.Another think - it's not just about the police being far away - what about civilians? There was at least one close enough to get shot by the police, it appears!
Still no answers, then. Keep taking the meds (or should I not mention a certain PM?).You must log in or register to see images
See post #46. You're nearly 2 days late.A couple of articles on Falklands war. Make of it what you will.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/guides/457000/457033/html/
http://www.theweek.co.uk/63055/how-did-the-falklands-war-start

And what if they were dirty bombs? There's a lot to consider in these circumstances. Sounds to me that the police were reckless. 50 bullets! Didn't someone say that there were fewer rounds fired when the SAS successfully attacked the Iranian Embassy?

