Off Topic World Cup Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Roo you will find the the Aussie defender just misses the ball and catches the player

Mate, BBC showed a replay where you can see the toes of the defender touch the ball and knock it onto Griezman. It’s a minimal touch, but that doesn’t matter. There was contact.
 
Mate, BBC showed a replay where you can see the toes of the defender touch the ball and knock it onto Griezman. It’s a minimal touch, but that doesn’t matter. There was contact.
Even without seeing the touch you know there was one by the way the ball bounced off Greizmann. Like the penalty given to Carrick and Utd against Gomes. The ball pings off Carrick's foot out to the touch line but apparently Hero didn't get the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roo
Can't disagree but different angles always tell another story.

Perhaps the referee didn’t have the same number of replay angles that we did. If that’s the case, then it’s something they need to sort out. Despite having “evidence”, he was still wrong, which just makes even more of a mockery of VAR.
 
Perhaps the referee didn’t have the same number of replay angles that we did. If that’s the case, then it’s something they need to sort out. Despite having “evidence”, he was still wrong, which just makes even more of a mockery of VAR.
And he is supposed to be 100% certain. He can't have been.
 
Lawrenson moaning about the goalline technology, saying it was unnecessary.
Why does he think that the ref gave it in the first place? Prick.