P.S. donga is now banned from the Utd board. Thought he had finally gotten the message and taken his tedious **** with him but obviously not, so a more direct approach was needed.
Lads, Lads, your missing the point of my article. Read my opening comment and you will see it has nothing to do with the Clattenburg incident ( although this seems to have been used somewhat successfully to direct attention away from their fans behaviour ) The FA can't just sweep this incident under the carpet or can they, assuming the "tyrants" rubles don't play a part !!!!
Had Chelsea not made a comlaint they would have been breaking the FA rules which says they have to tell the FA when an employee makes such a complaint. Chelsea don't have to have an investigation,they don't have to believe the employee but under the FA rules they DO have to tell the FA. What you are saying is Chelsea should have not told the FA and thus broken the rules. An interesting view that one.
Do you have a link to this statement? Amongst all the other stuff I appear to have missed this. Thanks.
It was reported in every media outlet. I have chosen the Guardian as it gives you an opportunity to claim it's Manchester propaganda. http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/20...racial-slur-chelsea?cat=football&type=article
And here's the one on the Chelsea FC website, just so he can't try to claim it's Utd propaganda http://www.chelseafc.com/chelsea-article/article/2966231
Absolutely disgraceful by the Chavs. What investigation did they do? That Ramirez may have heard something? If they had any integrity they would apologise to Clattenburg and compensate him for putting him through hell
So let me get this right. You are claiming that that statement made over 5 days after the game was the first time the incident came to light then. You're an absolute joke.
Try to find the part there about an OFFICIAL statement. Oh dear,poor poor attempt but not as poor as the other joker claiming the statement 5 days later was the first he'd heard of the incident. Pathetic attempts lads really really poor.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-Mark-Clattenburg-non-apology--Des-Kelly.html Is Clattenburg going to get an OFFICIAL apology then?
Was it an unofficial statement then? Who at Stamford Bridge had the audacity to release a statement that wasn't official? Roman will be livid.
Just in case you didn't read it the first time ======== "Lads, Lads, your missing the point of my article. Read my opening comment and you will see it has nothing to do with the Clattenburg incident ( although this seems to have been used somewhat successfully to direct attention away from their fans behaviour ) The FA can't just sweep this incident under the carpet or can they, assuming the "tyrants" rubles don't play a part !!!! "
Chelsea have released a statement saying they wish they'd given more thought to their statement before they released the statement to try and discredit Clattenburg after the Chelsea v United game. I think that makes some statement. What statement?
JUSTICE DONE John Mikel Obi banned for Mark Clattenburg threats http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20631964
Not really. Clattenburg is falsely accused and threatened by Mikel. Misses four matches thus effectively missing out on four weeks of match fees. Mikel falsely accuses and threatens Clattenburg. Misses three matches and gets fined less than a week's wage. Once again Chelsea get away with it...
He's not banned for falsely accusing him though, he had every right to be annoyed at what he though had been said. Come on, do better swarbs
