1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Why haven't the FA hammered Chelski yet ?

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by UNITED SINCE 63, Nov 6, 2012.

  1. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    P.S. donga is now banned from the Utd board. Thought he had finally gotten the message and taken his tedious **** with him but obviously not, so a more direct approach was needed.
     
    #41
  2. UNITED SINCE 63

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    3
    Lads, Lads, your missing the point of my article. Read my opening comment and you will see it has nothing to do with the Clattenburg incident ( although this seems to have been used somewhat successfully to direct attention away from their fans behaviour ) The FA can't just sweep this incident under the carpet or can they, assuming the "tyrants" rubles don't play a part !!!!
     
    #42
  3. CPofL KTBFFH

    CPofL KTBFFH New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,765
    Likes Received:
    59
    Had Chelsea not made a comlaint they would have been breaking the FA rules which says they have to tell the FA when an employee makes such a complaint. Chelsea don't have to have an investigation,they don't have to believe the employee but under the FA rules they DO have to tell the FA. What you are saying is Chelsea should have not told the FA and thus broken the rules. An interesting view that one.
     
    #43
  4. CPofL KTBFFH

    CPofL KTBFFH New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,765
    Likes Received:
    59
    Do you have a link to this statement? Amongst all the other stuff I appear to have missed this. Thanks.
     
    #44
  5. One of the lads

    One of the lads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,904
    Likes Received:
    164
    #45
  6. Chief

    Chief Northern Simpleton
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    39,314
    Likes Received:
    27,129
    Nice one.

    <ok>
     
    #46
  7. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    #47
  8. Christiansmith

    Christiansmith Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    9,727
    Likes Received:
    1,558
    Absolutely disgraceful by the Chavs. What investigation did they do? That Ramirez may have heard something?

    If they had any integrity they would apologise to Clattenburg and compensate him for putting him through hell <ok>
     
    #48
  9. CPofL KTBFFH

    CPofL KTBFFH New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,765
    Likes Received:
    59
    So let me get this right. You are claiming that that statement made over 5 days after the game was the first time the incident came to light then. You're an absolute joke.
     
    #49
  10. CPofL KTBFFH

    CPofL KTBFFH New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    4,765
    Likes Received:
    59
    Try to find the part there about an OFFICIAL statement. Oh dear,poor poor attempt but not as poor as the other joker claiming the statement 5 days later was the first he'd heard of the incident. Pathetic attempts lads really really poor.
     
    #50

  11. UnitedinRed

    UnitedinRed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    25,308
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Funny seeing you camped out over here.... on the United board <ok>
     
    #51
  12. UnitedinRed

    UnitedinRed Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Messages:
    25,308
    Likes Received:
    1,218
    Something about mocking dead people and tragedies?

    Can never tell with you BoS
     
    #52
  13. Gazautd

    Gazautd Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    13
    #53
  14. One of the lads

    One of the lads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,904
    Likes Received:
    164
    Was it an unofficial statement then? Who at Stamford Bridge had the audacity to release a statement that wasn't official? Roman will be livid.
     
    #54
  15. UNITED SINCE 63

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    3
    Just in case you didn't read it the first time ========:confused:
    "Lads, Lads, your missing the point of my article. Read my opening comment and you will see it has nothing to do with the Clattenburg incident ( although this seems to have been used somewhat successfully to direct attention away from their fans behaviour ) The FA can't just sweep this incident under the carpet or can they, assuming the "tyrants" rubles don't play a part !!!! "
     
    #55
  16. One of the lads

    One of the lads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,904
    Likes Received:
    164
    Chelsea have released a statement saying they wish they'd given more thought to their statement before they released the statement to try and discredit Clattenburg after the Chelsea v United game. I think that makes some statement.

    What statement?
     
    #56
  17. shwan

    shwan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    4,648
    Likes Received:
    126
    #57
  18. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    Not really.

    Clattenburg is falsely accused and threatened by Mikel. Misses four matches thus effectively missing out on four weeks of match fees.

    Mikel falsely accuses and threatens Clattenburg. Misses three matches and gets fined less than a week's wage.

    Once again Chelsea get away with it...
     
    #58
  19. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    He's not banned for falsely accusing him though, he had every right to be annoyed at what he though had been said. Come on, do better swarbs
     
    #59
  20. One of the lads

    One of the lads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Messages:
    4,904
    Likes Received:
    164
    Defending the indefensible. Again.

    Always the victim.
     
    #60

Share This Page