If you leave out a few times that Chico went off the deep end , he is better than Caulker , and a hell of a lot cheaper . Chico has done a **** of a lot more good than bad for the club , but there are a few of you that only bang on about the bad
That's my point. Their survival has more to do with an outstandig keeper than a decent back line. But Caulker isn't a bad player I just question the valuation.