Bentley's goal in that 4-4 was clearly just lucky. But have to feel sorry for the bitter old tosser I suppose, being in our shadow for so long can't be easy.
You are trying to argue that a club with £200m in cash reserves isn't hampered by servicing a debt. I am pointing out to you that the £200m wasn't amassed when our finances were restricted by us having to service said debt. Should I use words with single syllables to help you to understand ?
In fact, by that reasoning, every volleyed goal that has ever been scored has simply been down to luck. and as for bitterness, it's an affliction that seems to affect most of them.
"You are trying to argue that a club with £200m in cash reserves isn't hampered by servicing a debt. I am pointing out to you that the £200m wasn't amassed when our finances were restricted by us having to service said debt." You have made the claim that somebody has stated here that the Goons left Highbury with an immediate cash balance of 200m. I am asking you to show us where such a claim has been made. Once you have done that, then I'll return to the other comments you have made. Unless of course, in fact nobody has stated such a thing ...
No, I am pointing out to you that you made a claim that Arsenal couldn't have been hampered by servicing a debt when they had £200m in cash reserves. I am pointing out to you that when our servicing of the debt was restricting our finances we didn't have a cash reserve of £200m. Here's the single syllable version seeing as you seem to be having difficulty comprehending. There was no hoard of cash when we left our old home
"No" . Yes. You wrote this, did you not ?? If I can cut/paste the above, you can/cut paste the text of those that wrote the "narrative" . If somebody wrote it, quote it. Unless of course ( +1) in fact nobody has written such a thing ...
Here's your original quote. You are questioning why the the club were amassing a cash reserve of £200m whilst being held back by the debt burden. I am pointing out to you that Arsenal did not amass a £200m cash reserve whilst they were being held back by servicing that debt. It's really quite straight forward.
I suspect that you spuds didn't click on that 'all angles' video showing the technique and skill of Flamini's volley ? ..... So here it is again. and you're welcome
"You are questioning why the the club were amassing a cash reserve of £200m whilst being held back by the debt burden." So in fact you are stating that NOBODY claimed the Goons left Highbury with a cash balance of 200m. Correct ??
"So why make that claim when it wasn't happening ?" NO SUCH claim has been made here by anybody that the Goons left Highbury with 200m. That is pure delusion/fallacy on your part. So why claim there was a "narrative" based on that ??
Because that was your narrative. That Arsenal were amassing £200m whilst also being held back by servicing the debt. Which is incorrect. Keep being obtuse if get some gratification from it. But I am just following the events in Paris and haven't really got the appetite for this petty non argument anymore. Good evening to you
"Because that was your narrative. That Arsenal were amassing £200m whilst also being held back by servicing the debt. Which is incorrect. Keep being obtuse if get some gratification from it. But I am just following the events in Paris and haven't really got the appetite for this petty non argument anymore." You are simply not man enough to admit you made a false claim. And by using a news event as an excuse for trying to escape the fact, well that speaks volumes about you pal.
You are a petty person. I never claimed that, I said that your narrative was that Arsenal were amassing £200m whilst also being held back by debt. They weren't they didn't have that £200m when they were being held back by that debt. You have since tried to act in an obtuse manner to pursue a non point. As for 'using a news event as an excuse', quite bluntly you can go and get ****ed pal
