Ali or Thai-sen? - are you pulling my pi*ser? That half-baked little bully boy wouldn't have had the guts to go to the same city as the great Ali, much less the same ring. Frank Bruno (first round, first fight, 1988) hinted at it and Buster Douglas later confirmed it. Thai-sen or whatever his name was, wouldn't have lasted three rounds in Ali's sort of company.
Boobs or Bums (women's bums) Bacon or Sausages Death by Shark bite or Death by getting buried alive The Beatles or Rolling Stones Black Olives or Green Olives
Boobs. Although not a big boob lover. Bacon. Shark. **** the alternative. Stones. Refuse to answer last honking question.
Well first it was a World Champion with first-hand experience that called Casey that, not me. And it was Bruno and Douglas who asked all the questions of Thai-sen and exposed him - again, not me. So it think the personal bullshit can be adjudged as 'not working' already, eh? Frogs or toads, whatever - I recently posted the Ali v Cleveland Williams fight on another thread, and nobody ventured to answer. Well I'm still asking - how the hell would a tw*t like Thai-sen have coped with that? He'd have never even landed a blow, and he usually needed a combination to win anything. A combination on the guy in that film - are you kidding me? Totally different classes.
Are you getting all nostalgic? I get grief for reffering to him as Clay. His born name yet you have the nerve to mock tyson. Back in the day eh. When men were men. Note you ommited my referal back to worldd hardest man. How convinient.
Don't have a go at poor Relic 'Commo'... he's allowed his say, but you're not allowed your say cos you're talking absolute bollocks. Only his opinion counts, I've told you this a long time ago, now you have to learn the hard way. PS Enfield Mackem... otter, who was your favourite boxer?
No, not at all nostalgic mate. I'm just asking posters to look at a film of Ali (his chosen name) and tell me how a man who needed combinations lasting several seconds to win anything (instead of a single knock-out punch) would possibly cope. Nothing to do with "men were men" or any of that derogatory cr*p. Just a simple timeless question, that's all. Nobody's telling me that - how convenient, eh?
I haven't discredited Thai-sen at all. I've merely told it like it was - he rarely had a single punch to end a fight, and almost always needed combinations. I'm still asking the same question - how would that work against Ali, circa 1966? I've provided a link so that everyone can see what I mean - what more do you want me to do? I'm not at all telling anyone else what to think (as the sometimes deranged Manc ****head would like you to think). I have consistently asked a question - nothing more. Go ahead, fault me for that if Tel requires it (well he does seem to think he runs the SAFC board, doesn't he? Maybe he can't hack it on his own,board, eh, and picks on a genuine SAFC supporter like bonnybobbypark for his kicks).. I've told nobody anything. All I'm asking is how the hell would Thai-sen cope with the opponent in the link? pssst - come on Tel, instruct Commo what to say next.
